At-home, self-sampling of the skin microbiome: development of an unsupervised sampling approach

Large-scale skin microbiome studies are often restricted due to the need for participants to visit a research centre to have their skin swabbed by a trained individual. If samples taken by participants at home returned high-quality data, similar to that generated from samples taken by trained experts under controlled conditions, it would provide the potential for studies to have larger cohorts, include participants from multiple locations and facilitate longitudinal sample collection. Here, we describe the development of a novel unsupervised skin microbiome sample collection method and compare the data quality with that of supervised, in-lab sample collection. We enrolled 57 participants to collect skin swabs from their axillae, forearms, cheeks and scalps. Initially, samples were collected in our research centre under strict supervision by a trained expert. Participants then collected swabs from the same body sites 24 h later, unsupervised, at home, which they returned to the research centre within 3-5 days. All samples then underwent bacterial DNA extraction and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Yield of extracted bacterial DNA was different depending on body site, with the dry swabs from the forearm producing the lowest amount. There were no significant differences in alpha and beta-diversities between supervised and unsupervised sampling methods, regardless of body site. Taxonomic analysis of bacterial genera also did not differ for axilla, cheek or scalp. Our data suggest that self-sampling skin microbiome methods can produce data that are comparable to samples collected under the supervision of a trained expert in lab settings. These findings should encourage the scalability of future research and allow for greater representative population diversity in genomic and microbiome research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Access Microbiology
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000991.v3
Primary Topic
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

At-home, self-sampling of the skin microbiome: development of an unsupervised sampling approach

Margaret Scott, Anna Thomas, Timo Giesbrecht, Suzi Adams et al.
Access Microbiology
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
article

At-home, self-sampling of the skin microbiome: development of an unsupervised sampling approach

Margaret Scott, Anna Thomas, Timo Giesbrecht, Suzi Adams, John Tyson‐Carr, Nicholas Fallon, Joy Leng, Steve Paterson, Carl Roberts, Barry Murphy, Michael Hoptroff
article en

Abstract

Large-scale skin microbiome studies are often restricted due to the need for participants to visit a research centre to have their skin swabbed by a trained individual. If samples taken by participants at home returned high-quality data, similar to that generated from samples taken by trained experts under controlled conditions, it would provide the potential for studies to have larger cohorts, include participants from multiple locations and facilitate longitudinal sample collection. Here, we describe the development of a novel unsupervised skin microbiome sample collection method and compare the data quality with that of supervised, in-lab sample collection. We enrolled 57 participants to collect skin swabs from their axillae, forearms, cheeks and scalps. Initially, samples were collected in our research centre under strict supervision by a trained expert. Participants then collected swabs from the same body sites 24 h later, unsupervised, at home, which they returned to the research centre within 3-5 days. All samples then underwent bacterial DNA extraction and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Yield of extracted bacterial DNA was different depending on body site, with the dry swabs from the forearm producing the lowest amount. There were no significant differences in alpha and beta-diversities between supervised and unsupervised sampling methods, regardless of body site. Taxonomic analysis of bacterial genera also did not differ for axilla, cheek or scalp. Our data suggest that self-sampling skin microbiome methods can produce data that are comparable to samples collected under the supervision of a trained expert in lab settings. These findings should encourage the scalability of future research and allow for greater representative population diversity in genomic and microbiome research.

Access MicrobiologyVol. 7(8)
Unilever (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Liverpool (GB)
Innovate UK
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.