Assessing College Athletic Departments’ Ability to Implement the NCAA Mental Health Best Practices

Student-athletes endure rigorous schedules, intense pressure, and significant physical and mental strain, all while being expected to show no signs of weakness. This high-stakes environment can exacerbate mental health challenges (Harris & Maher, 2023; Rice et al, 2016 & Brown, 2021). To address these concerns, the NCAA’s Sport Science Institute developed mental health best practices to support college student-athletes. However, FBS Division I non-autonomous athletic programs often struggle to fully implement these guidelines due to resource limitations, despite their commitment to student-athlete well-being (2021; Beebe & Petrie, 2024). This study employs an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) approach to explore the lived experiences and perceptions of professionals working with student-athletes at select FBS Division I non-autonomous athletic programs regarding their programs’ ability to meet the NCAA’s mental health best practice recommendations. Representatives from eight of the twelve Mid-American Conference (MAC) athletic programs, all with expertise in their institutions’ mental health resources, participated in semi-structured interviews. Through IPA’s in-depth analysis, the findings reveal that while these programs provide essential mental health support, resource constraints hinder full adherence to key best practices. To address these challenges, this study offers budget-conscious recommendations aimed at strengthening mental health services and enhancing student-athlete well-being.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of issues in intercollegiate athletics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51221/sc.jiia.2025.18.1.12
Primary Topic
Sport Psychology and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing College Athletic Departments’ Ability to Implement the NCAA Mental Health Best Practices

Journal of issues in intercollegiate athletics
Sport Psychology and Performance
article

Assessing College Athletic Departments’ Ability to Implement the NCAA Mental Health Best Practices

article en

Abstract

Student-athletes endure rigorous schedules, intense pressure, and significant physical and mental strain, all while being expected to show no signs of weakness. This high-stakes environment can exacerbate mental health challenges (Harris & Maher, 2023; Rice et al, 2016 & Brown, 2021). To address these concerns, the NCAA’s Sport Science Institute developed mental health best practices to support college student-athletes. However, FBS Division I non-autonomous athletic programs often struggle to fully implement these guidelines due to resource limitations, despite their commitment to student-athlete well-being (2021; Beebe & Petrie, 2024). This study employs an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) approach to explore the lived experiences and perceptions of professionals working with student-athletes at select FBS Division I non-autonomous athletic programs regarding their programs’ ability to meet the NCAA’s mental health best practice recommendations. Representatives from eight of the twelve Mid-American Conference (MAC) athletic programs, all with expertise in their institutions’ mental health resources, participated in semi-structured interviews. Through IPA’s in-depth analysis, the findings reveal that while these programs provide essential mental health support, resource constraints hinder full adherence to key best practices. To address these challenges, this study offers budget-conscious recommendations aimed at strengthening mental health services and enhancing student-athlete well-being.

Journal of issues in intercollegiate athleticsVol. 18(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Sport Psychology and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.