Virtual Casing Principle in Models with 2D Plasma and 3D Wall in a Tokamak

The error arising in the description of the magnetic field is evaluated when the constraint is imposed that the external three-dimensional (3D) perturbation $${\mathbf{b}}$$ does not penetrate into the tokamak plasma. Such a three-dimensional approach has been used in the plasma equilibrium evolutionary problems solved by the CarMa code [F. Villone, L. Barbato, S. Mastrostefano, and S. Ventre, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 55, 095008 (2013)], where the plasma is treated as a two-dimensional (2D) object, while the vacuum vessel wall is three-dimensional (3D). The toroidal surface separating the 2D and 3D regions is called the coupling surface (CS). This surface acts as a virtual casing, but with the additional condition $${\mathbf{b}} = 0$$ imposed within the torus CS. Here, attention is attracted to the fact that, in a normal situation, the field $${\mathbf{b}}$$ in the plasma-wall gap must depend on the plasma response. However, the prescription $${\mathbf{b}} = 0$$ inside the torus CS eliminates this ambiguity. As a consequence, a discontinuity in the tangential component of $${\mathbf{b}}$$ inevitably arises at the CS, necessitating the presence of a current on this surface. The magnitude of this fictitious current and its contribution to the magnetic perturbation $${\mathbf{b}}$$ are estimated. It is shown that this current significantly influences both the magnitude and the distribution of the field $${\mathbf{b}}$$ .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s0021364025607067
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Virtual Casing Principle in Models with 2D Plasma and 3D Wall in a Tokamak

V. D. Pustovitov, M. E. Sukhovitskaya
Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Virtual Casing Principle in Models with 2D Plasma and 3D Wall in a Tokamak

V. D. Pustovitov, M. E. Sukhovitskaya
article en

Abstract

The error arising in the description of the magnetic field is evaluated when the constraint is imposed that the external three-dimensional (3D) perturbation $${\mathbf{b}}$$ does not penetrate into the tokamak plasma. Such a three-dimensional approach has been used in the plasma equilibrium evolutionary problems solved by the CarMa code [F. Villone, L. Barbato, S. Mastrostefano, and S. Ventre, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 55, 095008 (2013)], where the plasma is treated as a two-dimensional (2D) object, while the vacuum vessel wall is three-dimensional (3D). The toroidal surface separating the 2D and 3D regions is called the coupling surface (CS). This surface acts as a virtual casing, but with the additional condition $${\mathbf{b}} = 0$$ imposed within the torus CS. Here, attention is attracted to the fact that, in a normal situation, the field $${\mathbf{b}}$$ in the plasma-wall gap must depend on the plasma response. However, the prescription $${\mathbf{b}} = 0$$ inside the torus CS eliminates this ambiguity. As a consequence, a discontinuity in the tangential component of $${\mathbf{b}}$$ inevitably arises at the CS, necessitating the presence of a current on this surface. The magnitude of this fictitious current and its contribution to the magnetic perturbation $${\mathbf{b}}$$ are estimated. It is shown that this current significantly influences both the magnitude and the distribution of the field $${\mathbf{b}}$$ .

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics LettersVol. 122(4)
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (RU), Moscow Power Engineering Institute (RU), Kurchatov Institute (RU), Moscow Aviation Institute (RU)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.