Evaluating machine learning methods for PM2.5 estimation using satellite AOD, low-cost and reference-grade monitors in Kampala

Abstract This study investigates the effectiveness of machine learning models in estimating ground-level PM 2.5 concentrations using satellite-derived aerosol optical depth (AOD) in Kampala, a city with limited ground monitoring. Multivariate Linear Regression, Random Forest, and Multi-Layer Perceptron are compared using data from reference-grade and low-cost monitors. The study uses MODIS MAIAC AOD and PM 2.5 measurements from January 2022 to December 2023 from two collocation sites. The results indicate that Random Forest consistently outperforms other methods, demonstrating strong performance despite limited data; achieving the lowest RMSE: (7.72 $$\upmu \hbox{g}/\hbox{m}^3$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) and MAE: (5.5 $$\upmu \hbox{g}/\hbox{m}^3$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ), R 2 of (0.72) and correlation of 0.85. Models trained on combined datasets from multiple devices and sites generally yielded better results than those trained on individual devices’ data, suggesting the benefits of data integration for robust PM 2.5 estimation. Uniquely, the study demonstrates the viability of using low-cost sensor data as ground-truth for PM 2.5 estimation, with a model trained on low-cost sensor data achieving a RMSE: 10.9 $$\upmu \hbox{g}/\hbox{m}^3$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , MAE: 8.6 $$\upmu \hbox{g}/\hbox{m}^3$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , R 2 : 0.59 and Correlation: 0.78, when validated against collocated reference-grade monitors. The results show promise for using low-cost sensor data as ground truth in PM 2.5 estimation from satellite AOD, though further refinements are needed. This study contributes to the growing body of research on satellite-based air quality monitoring, particularly in cities in low- and middle-income countries where ground monitoring is limited. The results highlight the potential of using satellite data, machine learning techniques and low-cost sensors to improve PM 2.5 monitoring in under-resourced regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-025-06674-0
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating machine learning methods for PM2.5 estimation using satellite AOD, low-cost and reference-grade monitors in Kampala

Soumyabrata Dev, Priscilla Adong, Engineer Bainomugisha
4 citations
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
3.20
article

Evaluating machine learning methods for PM2.5 estimation using satellite AOD, low-cost and reference-grade monitors in Kampala

Soumyabrata Dev, Priscilla Adong, Engineer Bainomugisha
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the effectiveness of machine learning models in estimating ground-level PM 2.5 concentrations using satellite-derived aerosol optical depth (AOD) in Kampala, a city with limited ground monitoring. Multivariate Linear Regression, Random Forest, and Multi-Layer Perceptron are compared using data from reference-grade and low-cost monitors. The study uses MODIS MAIAC AOD and PM 2.5 measurements from January 2022 to December 2023 from two collocation sites. The results indicate that Random Forest consistently outperforms other methods, demonstrating strong performance despite limited data; achieving the lowest RMSE: (7.72 $$\upmu \hbox{g}/\hbox{m}^3$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) and MAE: (5.5 $$\upmu \hbox{g}/\hbox{m}^3$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ), R 2 of (0.72) and correlation of 0.85. Models trained on combined datasets from multiple devices and sites generally yielded better results than those trained on individual devices’ data, suggesting the benefits of data integration for robust PM 2.5 estimation. Uniquely, the study demonstrates the viability of using low-cost sensor data as ground-truth for PM 2.5 estimation, with a model trained on low-cost sensor data achieving a RMSE: 10.9 $$\upmu \hbox{g}/\hbox{m}^3$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , MAE: 8.6 $$\upmu \hbox{g}/\hbox{m}^3$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , R 2 : 0.59 and Correlation: 0.78, when validated against collocated reference-grade monitors. The results show promise for using low-cost sensor data as ground truth in PM 2.5 estimation from satellite AOD, though further refinements are needed. This study contributes to the growing body of research on satellite-based air quality monitoring, particularly in cities in low- and middle-income countries where ground monitoring is limited. The results highlight the potential of using satellite data, machine learning techniques and low-cost sensors to improve PM 2.5 monitoring in under-resourced regions.

International Journal of Environmental Science and TechnologyVol. 22(15)
University College Dublin (IE), Makerere University (UG)
Irish Research eLibrary, Science Foundation Ireland, University College Dublin
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
3.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.