Closed-loop geothermal systems: Critical review of technologies, performance enhancement, and emerging solutions

Closed-loop geothermal systems (CLGSs) represent an emerging technology in geothermal energy production that offers significant advantages over traditional enhanced geothermal systems (EGSs), including reduced environmental impact and broader geographical applicability. This comprehensive review analyzes the current state of CLGS technology, examining both coaxial and U-shaped system configurations while highlighting their key operational principles and advantages. We identify and discuss four major challenges facing CLGS development: (1) limited heat transfer efficiency due to conduction-dominated heat exchange and restricted wellbore-formation contact area, (2) thermal depletion in near-wellbore regions affecting long-term performance, (3) material durability issues under extreme temperature and pressure conditions, and (4) economic viability constraints particularly for power generation applications. Critical shortcomings that currently hinder commercialization include insufficient heat production rates for power generation, high initial capital costs, and uncertainties in long-term performance prediction. The review evaluates various innovative solutions to address these challenges, including near-wellbore thermal conductivity enhancement, utilization of convection in reservoirs, advanced wellbore designs with multiple laterals, and adoption of superior working fluids. We also examine the potential for repurposing abandoned oil and gas wells for geothermal energy production to reduce capital costs. The paper concludes by outlining future research needs, emphasizing the importance of developing enhanced heat transfer methods, improving wellbore materials, and establishing predictive models for long-term performance. While CLGSs currently show greater promise for direct heating applications, addressing these technological gaps and economic challenges could expand their viability for power generation in diverse geological settings. • Key challenges for designing closed-loop geothermal systems (CLGSs) are discussed. • The latest approaches to improving CLGS heat extraction are compared and evaluated. • The role of convection within reservoirs in CLGSs heat extraction is revealed. • Critical barriers for material and structural durability in CLGSs are summarized. • Future research needs and directions for CLGS development are suggested.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116177
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Closed-loop geothermal systems: Critical review of technologies, performance enhancement, and emerging solutions

Sai Liu, Arash Dahi Taleghani
7 citations
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
2.54
article

Closed-loop geothermal systems: Critical review of technologies, performance enhancement, and emerging solutions

Sai Liu, Arash Dahi Taleghani
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Closed-loop geothermal systems (CLGSs) represent an emerging technology in geothermal energy production that offers significant advantages over traditional enhanced geothermal systems (EGSs), including reduced environmental impact and broader geographical applicability. This comprehensive review analyzes the current state of CLGS technology, examining both coaxial and U-shaped system configurations while highlighting their key operational principles and advantages. We identify and discuss four major challenges facing CLGS development: (1) limited heat transfer efficiency due to conduction-dominated heat exchange and restricted wellbore-formation contact area, (2) thermal depletion in near-wellbore regions affecting long-term performance, (3) material durability issues under extreme temperature and pressure conditions, and (4) economic viability constraints particularly for power generation applications. Critical shortcomings that currently hinder commercialization include insufficient heat production rates for power generation, high initial capital costs, and uncertainties in long-term performance prediction. The review evaluates various innovative solutions to address these challenges, including near-wellbore thermal conductivity enhancement, utilization of convection in reservoirs, advanced wellbore designs with multiple laterals, and adoption of superior working fluids. We also examine the potential for repurposing abandoned oil and gas wells for geothermal energy production to reduce capital costs. The paper concludes by outlining future research needs, emphasizing the importance of developing enhanced heat transfer methods, improving wellbore materials, and establishing predictive models for long-term performance. While CLGSs currently show greater promise for direct heating applications, addressing these technological gaps and economic challenges could expand their viability for power generation in diverse geological settings. • Key challenges for designing closed-loop geothermal systems (CLGSs) are discussed. • The latest approaches to improving CLGS heat extraction are compared and evaluated. • The role of convection within reservoirs in CLGSs heat extraction is revealed. • Critical barriers for material and structural durability in CLGSs are summarized. • Future research needs and directions for CLGS development are suggested.

Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsVol. 225
Bureau of Economic Analysis (US), Pennsylvania State University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
2.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.