Does mandatory recognition of off–balance sheet liabilities affect capital structure choice? Evidence from <scp>SFAS</scp> 158

Abstract The Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 158 mandates the recognition of previously disclosed off–balance sheet liabilities (OBLs) for sponsors of defined benefit (DB) retirement plans. This recognition significantly increases reported liabilities, with notable variation across DB plan sponsors. We find that unrated DB plan sponsors reduce financial leverage following OBLs recognition, driven by net debt retirements and net equity issuances. These adjustments appear optimal because they bring firms closer to their estimated leverage targets. In contrast, DB plan sponsors with tight, floating‐GAAP covenants also reduce financial leverage, primarily through net debt retirements. The evidence suggests that on–balance sheet reporting requirements impact capital structure decisions through a rating or a covenant channel.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Accounting Research
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.13060
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does mandatory recognition of off–balance sheet liabilities affect capital structure choice? Evidence from SFAS 158

Michael Axenrod, Michael Kisser
Contemporary Accounting Research
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Does mandatory recognition of off–balance sheet liabilities affect capital structure choice? Evidence from SFAS 158

Michael Axenrod, Michael Kisser
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 158 mandates the recognition of previously disclosed off–balance sheet liabilities (OBLs) for sponsors of defined benefit (DB) retirement plans. This recognition significantly increases reported liabilities, with notable variation across DB plan sponsors. We find that unrated DB plan sponsors reduce financial leverage following OBLs recognition, driven by net debt retirements and net equity issuances. These adjustments appear optimal because they bring firms closer to their estimated leverage targets. In contrast, DB plan sponsors with tight, floating‐GAAP covenants also reduce financial leverage, primarily through net debt retirements. The evidence suggests that on–balance sheet reporting requirements impact capital structure decisions through a rating or a covenant channel.

Contemporary Accounting ResearchVol. 42(4)
BI Norwegian Business School (NO), ESCP Business School (GB)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does mandatory recognition of off–balance sheet liabilities affect capital structure choice? Evidence from <scp>SFAS</scp> 158 — Michael Axenrod, Michael Kisser · Contemporary Accounting Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS