The dark side of touch: how attachment style impacts touch through dark triad personality traits

Abstract Emerging research highlights that while intimate touch is often associated with relational well-being, individual differences exist in the extent to which it is experienced as aversive or used for coercive purposes. Dark triad personality traits (i.e., Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and narcissism) may contribute to these variations in touch experiences and behaviors, yet their role remains underexplored. In a sample of college students in romantic relationships ( N = 526), we examined dark triad traits as predictors of touch aversion and coercive touch and tested whether attachment insecurities serve as upstream influences on these effects. Results demonstrated that an antagonistic interpersonal style, represented by the shared variance among dark triad traits, was associated with greater touch aversion and coercive touch. Additionally, avoidant and anxious attachment orientations indirectly predicted both touch outcomes through dark triad traits. Several gender differences emerged, with dark triad traits fully mediating the effects of attachment insecurity on touch outcomes for women, whereas attachment orientations exerted direct effects for men. These findings extend theoretical models of intimate touch by identifying dark triad traits as key contributors to touch aversion and coercion while situating them within a broader attachment framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Psychology
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-08282-0
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The dark side of touch: how attachment style impacts touch through dark triad personality traits

Richard E. Mattson, Bridget N. Jules, Samantha A. Wagner, Emily R. Ives et al.
Current Psychology
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

The dark side of touch: how attachment style impacts touch through dark triad personality traits

Richard E. Mattson, Bridget N. Jules, Samantha A. Wagner, Emily R. Ives, Samantha L. Anduze
article en

Abstract

Abstract Emerging research highlights that while intimate touch is often associated with relational well-being, individual differences exist in the extent to which it is experienced as aversive or used for coercive purposes. Dark triad personality traits (i.e., Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and narcissism) may contribute to these variations in touch experiences and behaviors, yet their role remains underexplored. In a sample of college students in romantic relationships ( N = 526), we examined dark triad traits as predictors of touch aversion and coercive touch and tested whether attachment insecurities serve as upstream influences on these effects. Results demonstrated that an antagonistic interpersonal style, represented by the shared variance among dark triad traits, was associated with greater touch aversion and coercive touch. Additionally, avoidant and anxious attachment orientations indirectly predicted both touch outcomes through dark triad traits. Several gender differences emerged, with dark triad traits fully mediating the effects of attachment insecurity on touch outcomes for women, whereas attachment orientations exerted direct effects for men. These findings extend theoretical models of intimate touch by identifying dark triad traits as key contributors to touch aversion and coercion while situating them within a broader attachment framework.

Current PsychologyVol. 44(19)
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US), The New School (US), Binghamton University (US), University of Virginia (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.