Sensitivity of Asphalt Overlay Thickness to Implication of Geogrids Reinforcement

The sensitivity of the overlay thickness to the implementation of geogrid is assessed using two types of biaxial geogrid (AR-G and AR-1). Circular Asphalt concrete specimens of 152.4 mm diameter and 38.1 mm thickness were constructed and denoted as the lower layer. The hot asphalt concrete material required to construct the upper layer (representing overlay) of variable thickness (38.1 and 63.5) mm was compacted over the lower layer specimen after inserting the geogrid in between. The coupled specimens were tested in a model box of 50 x50 x70 cm filled with loose sand layer of 40 cm thickness, and the load – deformation data was recorded. Implementation of geogrids (AR-1 and AR-G) in thin asphalt concrete layer (38.1 mm over 38.1 mm) improved resistance to deformation by (83.3 and 33.3) % and the load sustaining capacity declined by (19.2, and 23) % respectively as compared with the control mixture. For thick asphalt concrete layer, (63.5 mm over 38.1mm), the implementation of geogrids exhibited improved resistance to deformation by 11.2 % regardless of the geogrid type and the load sustaining capacity declined by (40, and 50) % when AR-1 and AR-G geogrids were implemented respectively as compared with the control mixture. The viscoelastic stage of failure for the thin layer of reinforced asphalt concrete was extended to 6 mm of punching deformation as compared with the control sample. However, the thick layer of reinforced asphalt exhibits no significant variation in the stages of failure.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Brilliant Engineering
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36937/ben.2025.41007
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity of Asphalt Overlay Thickness to Implication of Geogrids Reinforcement

Saad Issa Sarsam
Brilliant Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

Sensitivity of Asphalt Overlay Thickness to Implication of Geogrids Reinforcement

Saad Issa Sarsam
article en

Abstract

The sensitivity of the overlay thickness to the implementation of geogrid is assessed using two types of biaxial geogrid (AR-G and AR-1). Circular Asphalt concrete specimens of 152.4 mm diameter and 38.1 mm thickness were constructed and denoted as the lower layer. The hot asphalt concrete material required to construct the upper layer (representing overlay) of variable thickness (38.1 and 63.5) mm was compacted over the lower layer specimen after inserting the geogrid in between. The coupled specimens were tested in a model box of 50 x50 x70 cm filled with loose sand layer of 40 cm thickness, and the load – deformation data was recorded. Implementation of geogrids (AR-1 and AR-G) in thin asphalt concrete layer (38.1 mm over 38.1 mm) improved resistance to deformation by (83.3 and 33.3) % and the load sustaining capacity declined by (19.2, and 23) % respectively as compared with the control mixture. For thick asphalt concrete layer, (63.5 mm over 38.1mm), the implementation of geogrids exhibited improved resistance to deformation by 11.2 % regardless of the geogrid type and the load sustaining capacity declined by (40, and 50) % when AR-1 and AR-G geogrids were implemented respectively as compared with the control mixture. The viscoelastic stage of failure for the thin layer of reinforced asphalt concrete was extended to 6 mm of punching deformation as compared with the control sample. However, the thick layer of reinforced asphalt exhibits no significant variation in the stages of failure.

Brilliant EngineeringVol. 6(2)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.