How Do SMEs Strategically Response to ESG Dynamics: Evidence From US Fashion Industry

ABSTRACT As ESG reporting becomes a strategic priority, small fashion businesses in the United States face mounting institutional pressure despite limited resources and ambiguous regulatory guidance. This study explores how these firms navigate ESG disclosure by analyzing 31 institutional themes through the lens of institutional theory. Findings reveal that companies employ varied strategic responses, including avoidance, acquiescence, defiance, and compromise, depending on how they interpret and manage external pressures. These responses reflect not only resource constraints but also differing perceptions of legitimacy and strategic alignment. The paper contributes to a nuanced understanding of how small enterprises negotiate fragmented institutional environments in the evolving ESG landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70133
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Do SMEs Strategically Response to ESG Dynamics: Evidence From US Fashion Industry

Ruirui Zhang, Tracie Tung, Chunmin Lang
Business Strategy and the Environment
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

How Do SMEs Strategically Response to ESG Dynamics: Evidence From US Fashion Industry

Ruirui Zhang, Tracie Tung, Chunmin Lang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT As ESG reporting becomes a strategic priority, small fashion businesses in the United States face mounting institutional pressure despite limited resources and ambiguous regulatory guidance. This study explores how these firms navigate ESG disclosure by analyzing 31 institutional themes through the lens of institutional theory. Findings reveal that companies employ varied strategic responses, including avoidance, acquiescence, defiance, and compromise, depending on how they interpret and manage external pressures. These responses reflect not only resource constraints but also differing perceptions of legitimacy and strategic alignment. The paper contributes to a nuanced understanding of how small enterprises negotiate fragmented institutional environments in the evolving ESG landscape.

Business Strategy and the EnvironmentVol. 34(8)
Louisiana State University (US), California State University, Northridge (US), Framingham State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.