Performance Mapping and Weighting for the Evapotranspiration Models of the OpenET Ensemble

Abstract Evapotranspiration (ET) accounts for the majority of water available from precipitation in the terrestrial water cycle, and improvements to the accuracy, resolution, and coverage of ET data can enhance hydrologic models and assessments. The OpenET collaboration of six remotely sensed ET modeling teams has demonstrated that an ensemble approach to ET estimation generally provides improved accuracy relative to individual ensemble members. The performance of individual models has been shown to vary by land cover type and climate zone, but a thorough study of the variables that influence model performance differences has not yet been conducted. In this paper, we model the performance of OpenET models relative to flux tower data as a function of variables such as land cover type and precipitation. These performance models are used to map estimated OpenET model performance across the conterminous United States. We develop relative weights based on these modeled performance metrics and show that a performance‐weighted ensemble improves accuracy relative to the current OpenET ensemble method to varying degrees. The monthly mean absolute error of the weighted ensemble is reduced relative to the current method by 8% in agricultural settings, by 23% in shrublands and mixed forests, and by 5% in grasslands and evergreen forests. We produce weight maps that can be used to generate performance‐weighted ensemble values for OpenET data. The results can be used to inform model selection and provide insight about the controls on model performance that could lead to model refinement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Resources Research
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr038899
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Mapping and Weighting for the Evapotranspiration Models of the OpenET Ensemble

G. B. Senay, M. D. Reitz, Thomas Ott, Ayşe Kiliç et al.
3 citations
Water Resources Research
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
3.32
article

Performance Mapping and Weighting for the Evapotranspiration Models of the OpenET Ensemble

G. B. Senay, M. D. Reitz, Thomas Ott, Ayşe Kiliç, A. J. Purdy, Forrest Melton, Anderson Ruhoff, John Volk, Joshua B. Fisher, Martha C. Anderson, Richard G. Allen, Justin Huntington
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Evapotranspiration (ET) accounts for the majority of water available from precipitation in the terrestrial water cycle, and improvements to the accuracy, resolution, and coverage of ET data can enhance hydrologic models and assessments. The OpenET collaboration of six remotely sensed ET modeling teams has demonstrated that an ensemble approach to ET estimation generally provides improved accuracy relative to individual ensemble members. The performance of individual models has been shown to vary by land cover type and climate zone, but a thorough study of the variables that influence model performance differences has not yet been conducted. In this paper, we model the performance of OpenET models relative to flux tower data as a function of variables such as land cover type and precipitation. These performance models are used to map estimated OpenET model performance across the conterminous United States. We develop relative weights based on these modeled performance metrics and show that a performance‐weighted ensemble improves accuracy relative to the current OpenET ensemble method to varying degrees. The monthly mean absolute error of the weighted ensemble is reduced relative to the current method by 8% in agricultural settings, by 23% in shrublands and mixed forests, and by 5% in grasslands and evergreen forests. We produce weight maps that can be used to generate performance‐weighted ensemble values for OpenET data. The results can be used to inform model selection and provide insight about the controls on model performance that could lead to model refinement.

Water Resources ResearchVol. 61(8)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), Ames Research Center (US), United States Geological Survey (US), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), United States Department of Agriculture (US), California State University, Monterey Bay (US), Chapman University (US), China Geological Survey (CN), Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (US), Arranta Bio (United States) (US), Desert Research Institute (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, U.S. Geological Survey
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.