A Framework for Variational Inference and Data Assimilation of Soil Biogeochemical Models Using Normalizing Flows

Abstract Soil biogeochemical models (SBMs) represent soil variables and their responses to global change. Data assimilation approaches help determine whether SBMs accurately represent soil processes consistent with soil pool and flux measurements. Bayesian inference is commonly used in data assimilation procedures that estimate posterior parameter distributions with Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. The ability to account for data and parameter uncertainty is a strength of MCMC inference, but the computational inefficiency of MCMC methods remains a barrier to their wider application, especially with large data sets. Given the limitations of MCMC approaches, we developed an alternative variational inference framework that uses a method called normalizing flows from the field of machine learning. Normalizing flows rely on deep learning to map probability distributions and approximate SBMs that have been discretized into state space models. As a test of our method, we fit approximated SBMs to synthetic data sourced from known data‐generating processes to identify discrepancies between the inference results and true parameter values. Our approach compares favorably with established MCMC methods and could be a viable alternative for SBM data assimilation that reduces computational time and resource needs. However, our method has some limitations, including challenges assimilating data with irregular measurement intervals, underestimation of posterior parameter uncertainty, and limited goodness‐of‐fit metrics for comparison to MCMC inference methods. Many of these limitations could be overcome with additional algorithm development based on the approaches we report here.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ms004547
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Framework for Variational Inference and Data Assimilation of Soil Biogeochemical Models Using Normalizing Flows

Steven Allison, Hua Wally Xie, Debora Sujono, Erik B. Sudderth et al.
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
article

A Framework for Variational Inference and Data Assimilation of Soil Biogeochemical Models Using Normalizing Flows

Steven Allison, Hua Wally Xie, Debora Sujono, Erik B. Sudderth, Thomas B. Ryder
article en

Abstract

Abstract Soil biogeochemical models (SBMs) represent soil variables and their responses to global change. Data assimilation approaches help determine whether SBMs accurately represent soil processes consistent with soil pool and flux measurements. Bayesian inference is commonly used in data assimilation procedures that estimate posterior parameter distributions with Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. The ability to account for data and parameter uncertainty is a strength of MCMC inference, but the computational inefficiency of MCMC methods remains a barrier to their wider application, especially with large data sets. Given the limitations of MCMC approaches, we developed an alternative variational inference framework that uses a method called normalizing flows from the field of machine learning. Normalizing flows rely on deep learning to map probability distributions and approximate SBMs that have been discretized into state space models. As a test of our method, we fit approximated SBMs to synthetic data sourced from known data‐generating processes to identify discrepancies between the inference results and true parameter values. Our approach compares favorably with established MCMC methods and could be a viable alternative for SBM data assimilation that reduces computational time and resource needs. However, our method has some limitations, including challenges assimilating data with irregular measurement intervals, underestimation of posterior parameter uncertainty, and limited goodness‐of‐fit metrics for comparison to MCMC inference methods. Many of these limitations could be overcome with additional algorithm development based on the approaches we report here.

Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth SystemsVol. 17(8)
University of California, Irvine (US), Newcastle College (GB), Irvine University (US), Newcastle University (GB)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.