Operationalizing AACSB’s societal impact standard: assessing SDG 8 integration through a community partner internship program

Purpose Although the revised AACSB’s Standard 9 provides a strategic direction, limited research has been conducted on operationalizing its integration into business schools. To address this gap, we defined and evaluated a framework to explicate societal impact through specific inputs, activities, outputs and outcomes at the organizational, student and faculty levels. Design/methodology/approach The study used a mixed-method approach. The data include quantitative and qualitative survey responses from nonprofit executives, which were analyzed using hypothesis testing. The qualitative responses from students were analyzed using natural language processing (NLP), and faculty evaluations used a standardized rubric. Findings The adopted model used in this research effectively measured the societal impact of Sustainable development goal (SDG) 8. Three key findings include: (1) Nonprofit executives reported contributions to their project success rate and enhanced decision-making processes. (2) The evaluation of student perceptions showed growth in career readiness competencies. (3) Faculty assessments indicated strengthened connections between academic preparation and workforce development with SDG 8 goals. The operationalization of activities and outputs within the internship program provided a framework for evaluating organizational and individual career development outcomes. Research limitations/implications This methodology has limitations: it does not account for other factors that may influence participants’ responses. This analysis focuses on determining whether the executive’s viewpoint deviates significantly from a neutral stance without considering the effects of additional variables. Another limitation is the sample size. Research on small sample sizes has demonstrated that the Type I error rate is close to the 5% nominal value in most cases (De Winter, 2019). Practical implications Our findings offer significant implications for AACSB accreditation by providing a practical framework for operationalizing SDG 8, which is used across many currently accredited universities. The paper can be used as supplementary information for AACSB interpretive guidance. This perspective can influence how AACSB evaluates and supports business education programs aimed at providing broader views of program effectiveness and AACSB accreditation of business schools. Future research could focus on providing schools with a comprehensive assessment tool kit for universities seeking accreditation. Social implications Our program can have a national or international appeal. If it can be successfully implemented across multiple universities, federal/state/local municipalities can collaborate with nonprofit organizations to pair with public business schools to achieve the SDGs. Additionally, the government may consider policies requiring organizations that receive loans/funding/support to partner with business schools to bolster participation. This model could serve as a structural architecture for addressing other societal challenges beyond SDG 8, potentially simultaneously evaluating multiple SDGs that affect constituents locally and globally. Originality/value This research demonstrates a novel framework for operationalizing AACSB’s Standard 9 using SDG 8 in the information systems discipline. This model of implementing data-driven community partner internships can be integrated across business schools nationally and internationally. Our assessment approach provides valuable insights for accreditation bodies, educators, researchers, employers and students on implementing and assessing societal impact initiatives in business education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jbsed-02-2025-0023
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Higher Education and Employability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Operationalizing AACSB’s societal impact standard: assessing SDG 8 integration through a community partner internship program

Pamella Howell, Arun Aryal, Charleata Battle
1 citations
Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development
Higher Education and Employability
8.93
article

Operationalizing AACSB’s societal impact standard: assessing SDG 8 integration through a community partner internship program

Pamella Howell, Arun Aryal, Charleata Battle
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose Although the revised AACSB’s Standard 9 provides a strategic direction, limited research has been conducted on operationalizing its integration into business schools. To address this gap, we defined and evaluated a framework to explicate societal impact through specific inputs, activities, outputs and outcomes at the organizational, student and faculty levels. Design/methodology/approach The study used a mixed-method approach. The data include quantitative and qualitative survey responses from nonprofit executives, which were analyzed using hypothesis testing. The qualitative responses from students were analyzed using natural language processing (NLP), and faculty evaluations used a standardized rubric. Findings The adopted model used in this research effectively measured the societal impact of Sustainable development goal (SDG) 8. Three key findings include: (1) Nonprofit executives reported contributions to their project success rate and enhanced decision-making processes. (2) The evaluation of student perceptions showed growth in career readiness competencies. (3) Faculty assessments indicated strengthened connections between academic preparation and workforce development with SDG 8 goals. The operationalization of activities and outputs within the internship program provided a framework for evaluating organizational and individual career development outcomes. Research limitations/implications This methodology has limitations: it does not account for other factors that may influence participants’ responses. This analysis focuses on determining whether the executive’s viewpoint deviates significantly from a neutral stance without considering the effects of additional variables. Another limitation is the sample size. Research on small sample sizes has demonstrated that the Type I error rate is close to the 5% nominal value in most cases (De Winter, 2019). Practical implications Our findings offer significant implications for AACSB accreditation by providing a practical framework for operationalizing SDG 8, which is used across many currently accredited universities. The paper can be used as supplementary information for AACSB interpretive guidance. This perspective can influence how AACSB evaluates and supports business education programs aimed at providing broader views of program effectiveness and AACSB accreditation of business schools. Future research could focus on providing schools with a comprehensive assessment tool kit for universities seeking accreditation. Social implications Our program can have a national or international appeal. If it can be successfully implemented across multiple universities, federal/state/local municipalities can collaborate with nonprofit organizations to pair with public business schools to achieve the SDGs. Additionally, the government may consider policies requiring organizations that receive loans/funding/support to partner with business schools to bolster participation. This model could serve as a structural architecture for addressing other societal challenges beyond SDG 8, potentially simultaneously evaluating multiple SDGs that affect constituents locally and globally. Originality/value This research demonstrates a novel framework for operationalizing AACSB’s Standard 9 using SDG 8 in the information systems discipline. This model of implementing data-driven community partner internships can be integrated across business schools nationally and internationally. Our assessment approach provides valuable insights for accreditation bodies, educators, researchers, employers and students on implementing and assessing societal impact initiatives in business education.

Journal of Business and Socio-economic DevelopmentVol. 5(4)
California State University Los Angeles (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Higher Education and Employability
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.