Diet, genetic factors, and the risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma

<i>Introduction</i>: Diet has been recognized as the most pivotal modifiable lifestyle factor in the development of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), Barrett's Esophagus (BE) and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (EA). However, the associations between dietary ingredients, patterns, and diet-gene interactions with the risk of GERD, BE and EA remain unclear. <i>Methods</i>: The prospective cohort study included 502 412 participants from the UK Biobank. Dietary ingredients, patterns, and the associations with the incidence of GERD, BE and EA were investigated using Cox proportional hazard models. Additionally, we calculated a healthy dietary score based on eight primary dietary factors. Furthermore, polygenic risk scores were developed to explore potential diet-gene interactions. <i>Results</i>: Over an average follow-up of 12.5 years, we identified 29 564 incident cases of GERD, 4081 cases of BE and 539 cases of EA. Frequent tea intake was consistently associated with an increased risk of GERD (HR = 1.04, CI: 1.03, 1.05), BE (HR = 1.08, CI: 1.06, 1.11) and EA (HR = 1.07, CI: 1.01, 1.14), while higher dietary fiber consumption was inversely associated with the risks (HR = 0.92 for GERD, CI: 0.90, 0.94; HR = 0.78 for BE, CI: 0.73, 0.84; HR = 0.81 for EA, CI: 0.68, 0.97). In the dietary pattern analysis, the prudent pattern was linked to a lower risk of GERD, BE and EA (HR = 0.95 for GERD, CI: 0.91, 0.98; HR = 0.84 for BE, CI: 0.76, 0.92; HR = 0.70 for EA, CI: 0.53, 0.93). Significant additive and multiplicative interactions were observed between diet and genetic risk for BE (RERI = 0.32, CI: 0.11, 0.52; <i>P</i><sub>multiplicative interaction</sub> = 0.039) and EA (RERI = 0.84, CI: 0.34, 1.33; <i>P</i><sub>multiplicative interaction</sub> = 0.038). <i>Discussion</i>: Our study highlights the role of dietary exposure in the etiology of GERD, BE and EA. Healthy dietary interventions may be beneficial, especially for populations with high genetic risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food & Function
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/d5fo00369e
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diet, genetic factors, and the risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma

Weibing Wu, Jianan Zheng, Ting Wang, Yichan Zhou et al.
1 citations
Food & Function
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
2.01
article

Diet, genetic factors, and the risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma

Weibing Wu, Jianan Zheng, Ting Wang, Yichan Zhou, Tongyu Zhang, Mei Lü, Liang Chen, Jing Xu, Jing Cao, Zihan Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Introduction</i>: Diet has been recognized as the most pivotal modifiable lifestyle factor in the development of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), Barrett's Esophagus (BE) and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (EA). However, the associations between dietary ingredients, patterns, and diet-gene interactions with the risk of GERD, BE and EA remain unclear. <i>Methods</i>: The prospective cohort study included 502 412 participants from the UK Biobank. Dietary ingredients, patterns, and the associations with the incidence of GERD, BE and EA were investigated using Cox proportional hazard models. Additionally, we calculated a healthy dietary score based on eight primary dietary factors. Furthermore, polygenic risk scores were developed to explore potential diet-gene interactions. <i>Results</i>: Over an average follow-up of 12.5 years, we identified 29 564 incident cases of GERD, 4081 cases of BE and 539 cases of EA. Frequent tea intake was consistently associated with an increased risk of GERD (HR = 1.04, CI: 1.03, 1.05), BE (HR = 1.08, CI: 1.06, 1.11) and EA (HR = 1.07, CI: 1.01, 1.14), while higher dietary fiber consumption was inversely associated with the risks (HR = 0.92 for GERD, CI: 0.90, 0.94; HR = 0.78 for BE, CI: 0.73, 0.84; HR = 0.81 for EA, CI: 0.68, 0.97). In the dietary pattern analysis, the prudent pattern was linked to a lower risk of GERD, BE and EA (HR = 0.95 for GERD, CI: 0.91, 0.98; HR = 0.84 for BE, CI: 0.76, 0.92; HR = 0.70 for EA, CI: 0.53, 0.93). Significant additive and multiplicative interactions were observed between diet and genetic risk for BE (RERI = 0.32, CI: 0.11, 0.52; <i>P</i><sub>multiplicative interaction</sub> = 0.039) and EA (RERI = 0.84, CI: 0.34, 1.33; <i>P</i><sub>multiplicative interaction</sub> = 0.038). <i>Discussion</i>: Our study highlights the role of dietary exposure in the etiology of GERD, BE and EA. Healthy dietary interventions may be beneficial, especially for populations with high genetic risk.

Food & FunctionVol. 16(18)
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (CN), Jiangsu Province Hospital (CN), Nanjing Medical University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.