AI-AUGMENTED TAX RISK SCORING FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES: A PANEL DATA STUDY

This study investigates the impact of AI-augmented tax risk scoring systems on small and medium enterprises (SMEs) over a twelve-year period (2010–2022), employing a comprehensive time series methodology that integrates both classical econometric techniques and advanced machine learning models. By situating the analysis within three distinct phases—pre-AI (2010–2014), transitional e-invoicing adoption (2015–2017), and post-AI hybrid implementation (2018–2022)—the study captures structural and dynamic shifts in compliance indicators, model performance, and sectoral disparities. Data were sourced from national tax authority archives, SME financial statements, transactional data feeds, and macroeconomic indicators, harmonized into a quarterly panel to ensure analytical consistency. Statistical modeling employed ARIMA to isolate baseline trends and seasonality, VAR to examine interdependencies between compliance rates and model accuracy, and LSTM neural networks to capture non-linear, temporal anomalies. Findings reveal two statistically significant regime shifts: first, the 2015–2017 e-invoicing rollout, which reduced high-risk classifications by approximately 14% and increased anomaly detection by 17%; and second, the 2018 AI-hybrid adoption, which improved predictive precision by 12.4%, recall by 15.2%, and reduced compliance rate volatility by nearly 20%. Digitally intensive sectors such as e-commerce and ICT services experienced the largest compliance gains (22–28% risk score reduction), while high-informality sectors achieved modest improvements (6–9%). Spatial analysis demonstrates positive inter-jurisdictional spillovers, with metropolitan adoption driving a 4–6% compliance efficiency increase in neighboring regions. Overall, the results confirm that AI-augmented tax risk scoring, when paired with diverse data integration and robust governance, enhances detection efficiency, stabilizes compliance trends, and progressively reduces regional and sectoral disparities in SME tax enforcement. These outcomes have significant implications for the design of adaptive, transparent, and equitable compliance monitoring systems in tax administrations worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63125/dpw2xr52
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Taxation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-AUGMENTED TAX RISK SCORING FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES: A PANEL DATA STUDY

Md Redwanul Islam
1 citations
Taxation and Compliance Studies
3.13
article

AI-AUGMENTED TAX RISK SCORING FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES: A PANEL DATA STUDY

Md Redwanul Islam
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of AI-augmented tax risk scoring systems on small and medium enterprises (SMEs) over a twelve-year period (2010–2022), employing a comprehensive time series methodology that integrates both classical econometric techniques and advanced machine learning models. By situating the analysis within three distinct phases—pre-AI (2010–2014), transitional e-invoicing adoption (2015–2017), and post-AI hybrid implementation (2018–2022)—the study captures structural and dynamic shifts in compliance indicators, model performance, and sectoral disparities. Data were sourced from national tax authority archives, SME financial statements, transactional data feeds, and macroeconomic indicators, harmonized into a quarterly panel to ensure analytical consistency. Statistical modeling employed ARIMA to isolate baseline trends and seasonality, VAR to examine interdependencies between compliance rates and model accuracy, and LSTM neural networks to capture non-linear, temporal anomalies. Findings reveal two statistically significant regime shifts: first, the 2015–2017 e-invoicing rollout, which reduced high-risk classifications by approximately 14% and increased anomaly detection by 17%; and second, the 2018 AI-hybrid adoption, which improved predictive precision by 12.4%, recall by 15.2%, and reduced compliance rate volatility by nearly 20%. Digitally intensive sectors such as e-commerce and ICT services experienced the largest compliance gains (22–28% risk score reduction), while high-informality sectors achieved modest improvements (6–9%). Spatial analysis demonstrates positive inter-jurisdictional spillovers, with metropolitan adoption driving a 4–6% compliance efficiency increase in neighboring regions. Overall, the results confirm that AI-augmented tax risk scoring, when paired with diverse data integration and robust governance, enhances detection efficiency, stabilizes compliance trends, and progressively reduces regional and sectoral disparities in SME tax enforcement. These outcomes have significant implications for the design of adaptive, transparent, and equitable compliance monitoring systems in tax administrations worldwide.

Vol. 01(01)
University of New Haven (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Taxation and Compliance Studies
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.