Macro-level drivers of violent extremism in Tunisia through new institutionalism

Using a NEO-institutionalist approach, this article analyzes state-institutional dynamics and practices influencing radicalization and violent extremism (VE) in Tunisia in the context of political transformation after 2011. Focusing on macro-level analysis, it highlights institutional limitations such as slow innovation, poor coordination, and resistance to change. A key finding is the persistent triangular dynamic of regional disparities, socio-economic grievances, and unequal development at the heart of a failing long-standing governance-development model, fueling frustration especially among youths. Violent extremist narratives exploit these vulnerabilities, while moderate counter-narratives remain weak. The predominance of security-focused responses fails to address root causes, emphasizing the need for inclusive, preventive policies co-designed with communities and civil society. Effective VE prevention requires improved institutional coordination and engagement in in-depth consultation with all relevant stakeholders.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Regional Security
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5937/jrs20-43791
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Macro-level drivers of violent extremism in Tunisia through new institutionalism

Tasnim Chirchi, Khaoula Ghribi
2 citations
Journal of Regional Security
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
8.40
article

Macro-level drivers of violent extremism in Tunisia through new institutionalism

Tasnim Chirchi, Khaoula Ghribi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Using a NEO-institutionalist approach, this article analyzes state-institutional dynamics and practices influencing radicalization and violent extremism (VE) in Tunisia in the context of political transformation after 2011. Focusing on macro-level analysis, it highlights institutional limitations such as slow innovation, poor coordination, and resistance to change. A key finding is the persistent triangular dynamic of regional disparities, socio-economic grievances, and unequal development at the heart of a failing long-standing governance-development model, fueling frustration especially among youths. Violent extremist narratives exploit these vulnerabilities, while moderate counter-narratives remain weak. The predominance of security-focused responses fails to address root causes, emphasizing the need for inclusive, preventive policies co-designed with communities and civil society. Effective VE prevention requires improved institutional coordination and engagement in in-depth consultation with all relevant stakeholders.

Journal of Regional SecurityVol. 20(1)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.