How to Thrive in Times of Threat and Uncertainty

ABSTRACT President Donald Trump's Executive Orders in January 2025, subsequent grant terminations, and attacks on science elicited widespread concern and uncertainty regarding the future of science and the viability of research labs, institutions, and careers. We suggest the Executive Orders and anti‐science proposals not only created an existential threat to science but threatened people's fundamental psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Drawing upon social psychological theory and research, we offer suggestions for how people can cope with threats at the individual, relational, and group level. At the individual level, scholars can expand their research programs, reappraise stressors as challenges, cultivate resilience, and find opportunities for growth in the face of difficulty. At the relational level, researchers can adopt a communal orientation, seek social support, collaborate with others in their communities both in and outside academia, and strengthen social connectedness. At the group level, scholars can engage in coalition‐building and collective action to show allyship and solidarity with marginalized communities. Throughout the paper, we discuss how scientists can find meaning and purpose in times of threat and work together to redefine and reshape culture to mutually benefit science and society at large.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.70076
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to Thrive in Times of Threat and Uncertainty

Esther Hanbyeol Lee, Nicole Koefler, Lora E. Park, Izilda Pereira‐Jorge et al.
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Behavioral Health and Interventions
article

How to Thrive in Times of Threat and Uncertainty

Esther Hanbyeol Lee, Nicole Koefler, Lora E. Park, Izilda Pereira‐Jorge, Kimberly E. Chaney
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT President Donald Trump's Executive Orders in January 2025, subsequent grant terminations, and attacks on science elicited widespread concern and uncertainty regarding the future of science and the viability of research labs, institutions, and careers. We suggest the Executive Orders and anti‐science proposals not only created an existential threat to science but threatened people's fundamental psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Drawing upon social psychological theory and research, we offer suggestions for how people can cope with threats at the individual, relational, and group level. At the individual level, scholars can expand their research programs, reappraise stressors as challenges, cultivate resilience, and find opportunities for growth in the face of difficulty. At the relational level, researchers can adopt a communal orientation, seek social support, collaborate with others in their communities both in and outside academia, and strengthen social connectedness. At the group level, scholars can engage in coalition‐building and collective action to show allyship and solidarity with marginalized communities. Throughout the paper, we discuss how scientists can find meaning and purpose in times of threat and work together to redefine and reshape culture to mutually benefit science and society at large.

Social and Personality Psychology CompassVol. 19(8)
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Behavioral Health and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.