Exploring foreign language learners’ cognitive motivation in the learning process and subsequent language use

This study compares foreign language learners’ cognitive motivation across two stages: the language learning process and subsequent language use in professional settings. It specifically examines how learners’ level of multilingualism, based on the number of foreign languages learned and used during university, shapes motivation in each stage. Drawing on data from 190 Chinese university graduates who studied foreign languages and now use them professionally, the study employed a questionnaire survey combining Likert-scale items and open-ended questions. Quantitative data were analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA, while qualitative responses underwent thematic analysis. The findings reveal that both the mode of language engagement (i.e., formal learning vs. practical use) and the degree of multilingualism (one, two, or three or more languages) significantly influence cognitive motivation. Motivation was highest in real-world use contexts, and while multilingualism provided motivational benefits, its influence was complex and non-uniform, partly due to factors such as cognitive overload and differing contextual demands between learning and use. Learners of two languages maintained motivation more consistently than those managing three or more. These insights inform language education by highlighting the importance of balancing linguistic challenge and contextual relevance to sustain learner motivation across multilingual trajectories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05683-1
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring foreign language learners’ cognitive motivation in the learning process and subsequent language use

Hao Xu, Fang Zhang
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Exploring foreign language learners’ cognitive motivation in the learning process and subsequent language use

Hao Xu, Fang Zhang
article en

Abstract

This study compares foreign language learners’ cognitive motivation across two stages: the language learning process and subsequent language use in professional settings. It specifically examines how learners’ level of multilingualism, based on the number of foreign languages learned and used during university, shapes motivation in each stage. Drawing on data from 190 Chinese university graduates who studied foreign languages and now use them professionally, the study employed a questionnaire survey combining Likert-scale items and open-ended questions. Quantitative data were analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA, while qualitative responses underwent thematic analysis. The findings reveal that both the mode of language engagement (i.e., formal learning vs. practical use) and the degree of multilingualism (one, two, or three or more languages) significantly influence cognitive motivation. Motivation was highest in real-world use contexts, and while multilingualism provided motivational benefits, its influence was complex and non-uniform, partly due to factors such as cognitive overload and differing contextual demands between learning and use. Learners of two languages maintained motivation more consistently than those managing three or more. These insights inform language education by highlighting the importance of balancing linguistic challenge and contextual relevance to sustain learner motivation across multilingual trajectories.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Beijing Foreign Studies University (CN)
Beijing Foreign Studies University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.