Quantifying the global energy transition: A policy-ready framework linking renewable deployment and emissions outcomes

This study introduces a new Energy Transition Index (ETI) model for quantifying the relationship between energy transition driven by policy and emissions outcomes. ETI is driven by Renewable-to-Fossil energy ratio (RE/FF), which when increased by 1.0 increases the ETI by 0.528 units (p < 0.001) and Policy Score. Energy Intensity (EI) modeling reveals that national recovery paths diverged post-COVID. In countries like Germany and France, where recovery aligned with climate goals, ETI grew by 2.2–3.6 % annually. In fossil-dependent nations like the USA and Mexico, recovery stalled or reversed. Investments in infrastructure had a dual effect: where electrification and grid modernization increased emissions intensity (+0.34 and + 0.47 coefficients respectively) unless accompanied by clean energy. Even with strong energy demand reductions, 2050 emissions are projected at 20–30 Gt CO 2 /year—well above the 1.5 °C target range of 5–10 Gt. This framework allows policymakers to run simulations of interventions, track their progress through benchmarking, and focus on those interventions that produce the most substantial impact—illustrated by a 60 % increase in RE/FF in Germany, resulting in a 50 % halving of emissions intensity from 2015 to 2022. Key recommendations are to coordinate the deployment of renewables, policy, and infrastructure construction; to leverage green stimulus finance; and to target climate finance toward institutional gaps. As a replicable tool for net-zero planning, the model could be improved by incorporating nonlinear policy effects and regional barriers. The findings show that closing the gap between climate pledges and action will require coordinated, data-driven, and systematic strategies. • New Energy Transition Index (ETI) model links policy to emissions outcomes. • RE/FF ratio and Policy Score are key drivers. • COVID-19 recovery strategies caused 2.2–3.6 % vs −1.6 % ETI growth divergence. • Infrastructure upgrades boost emissions intensity if not paired with clean energy. • 2050 simulations show 20–30 Gt CO 2 /yr even in best-case energy scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116189
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the global energy transition: A policy-ready framework linking renewable deployment and emissions outcomes

Solomon Evro, Olusegun Stanley Tomomewo, Moones Alamooti
5 citations
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Climate Change Policy and Economics
15.66
article

Quantifying the global energy transition: A policy-ready framework linking renewable deployment and emissions outcomes

Solomon Evro, Olusegun Stanley Tomomewo, Moones Alamooti
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This study introduces a new Energy Transition Index (ETI) model for quantifying the relationship between energy transition driven by policy and emissions outcomes. ETI is driven by Renewable-to-Fossil energy ratio (RE/FF), which when increased by 1.0 increases the ETI by 0.528 units (p < 0.001) and Policy Score. Energy Intensity (EI) modeling reveals that national recovery paths diverged post-COVID. In countries like Germany and France, where recovery aligned with climate goals, ETI grew by 2.2–3.6 % annually. In fossil-dependent nations like the USA and Mexico, recovery stalled or reversed. Investments in infrastructure had a dual effect: where electrification and grid modernization increased emissions intensity (+0.34 and + 0.47 coefficients respectively) unless accompanied by clean energy. Even with strong energy demand reductions, 2050 emissions are projected at 20–30 Gt CO 2 /year—well above the 1.5 °C target range of 5–10 Gt. This framework allows policymakers to run simulations of interventions, track their progress through benchmarking, and focus on those interventions that produce the most substantial impact—illustrated by a 60 % increase in RE/FF in Germany, resulting in a 50 % halving of emissions intensity from 2015 to 2022. Key recommendations are to coordinate the deployment of renewables, policy, and infrastructure construction; to leverage green stimulus finance; and to target climate finance toward institutional gaps. As a replicable tool for net-zero planning, the model could be improved by incorporating nonlinear policy effects and regional barriers. The findings show that closing the gap between climate pledges and action will require coordinated, data-driven, and systematic strategies. • New Energy Transition Index (ETI) model links policy to emissions outcomes. • RE/FF ratio and Policy Score are key drivers. • COVID-19 recovery strategies caused 2.2–3.6 % vs −1.6 % ETI growth divergence. • Infrastructure upgrades boost emissions intensity if not paired with clean energy. • 2050 simulations show 20–30 Gt CO 2 /yr even in best-case energy scenarios.

Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsVol. 225
University of North Dakota (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
15.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.