Recognising Capabilities: The Importance of Recognition for Human Flourishing

This article aims to enrich critical sociolegal scholarship and methodological approaches within the field of capability theory by introducing ‘recognising capabilities analysis’. The recognising capabilities analysis embeds Nancy Fraser's theory of recognition (particularly her concept of parity of participation), into the capability paradigm. It examines the particular role of law and legal regulation in determining the relationships of (mis)recognition operating between the state and disadvantaged groups. Systemic misrecognition tends to entrench disparities in participation. It sets up cycles of disadvantage which prevent marginalised individuals from realising greater capabilities and securing equal access to the basic goods, services, and social spaces essential for a liveable human life. The recognising capabilities analysis provides a useful normative and analytical device for identifying and challenging diverse forms of structural disadvantage and injustice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modern Law Review
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12976
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recognising Capabilities: The Importance of Recognition for Human Flourishing

Alex Louise Pearl
Modern Law Review
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

Recognising Capabilities: The Importance of Recognition for Human Flourishing

Alex Louise Pearl
article en

Abstract

This article aims to enrich critical sociolegal scholarship and methodological approaches within the field of capability theory by introducing ‘recognising capabilities analysis’. The recognising capabilities analysis embeds Nancy Fraser's theory of recognition (particularly her concept of parity of participation), into the capability paradigm. It examines the particular role of law and legal regulation in determining the relationships of (mis)recognition operating between the state and disadvantaged groups. Systemic misrecognition tends to entrench disparities in participation. It sets up cycles of disadvantage which prevent marginalised individuals from realising greater capabilities and securing equal access to the basic goods, services, and social spaces essential for a liveable human life. The recognising capabilities analysis provides a useful normative and analytical device for identifying and challenging diverse forms of structural disadvantage and injustice.

Modern Law ReviewVol. 88(6)
Economic and Social Research Council (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Recognising Capabilities: The Importance of Recognition for Human Flourishing — Alex Louise Pearl · Modern Law Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS