A Critical Reading of the Definition of Myth in Kurdish Literature

This paper is entitled: (A Critical Reading of the Definition of Myth in Kurdish Literature). This paper is a critical reading of the definitions of myth in two master's theses which consists of the two parts. The first part is theoretical and contains the two topics. The first topic deals with the definition, principles and conditions, and the second topic mentions the concepts, terms and definitions of myth. The second part is practical which consists of two topic. In the first topic, a critical reading has been done to the definitions of myth in the first thesis depending on the definition of the definition, principles and conditions with the definition of myth practically. In the second topic a critical reading of the definitions of myth has been done in the second thesis. In this study, we have concluded that the definitions of myth in both theses don’t follow the conditions and principles of definition very well in a way that most of the definitions do not mention: (gender, type, discrimination, characteristics, form) of myth although they are not comprehensive, inclusive or prohibitive. paper method: This paper relies on the method (descriptive - analytical).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Twejer
Published
2025-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31918/twejer.2573.39
Primary Topic
Cultural and Sociopolitical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Critical Reading of the Definition of Myth in Kurdish Literature

Sirwan Jabbar Amin
Twejer
Cultural and Sociopolitical Studies
article

A Critical Reading of the Definition of Myth in Kurdish Literature

Sirwan Jabbar Amin
article en

Abstract

This paper is entitled: (A Critical Reading of the Definition of Myth in Kurdish Literature). This paper is a critical reading of the definitions of myth in two master's theses which consists of the two parts. The first part is theoretical and contains the two topics. The first topic deals with the definition, principles and conditions, and the second topic mentions the concepts, terms and definitions of myth. The second part is practical which consists of two topic. In the first topic, a critical reading has been done to the definitions of myth in the first thesis depending on the definition of the definition, principles and conditions with the definition of myth practically. In the second topic a critical reading of the definitions of myth has been done in the second thesis. In this study, we have concluded that the definitions of myth in both theses don’t follow the conditions and principles of definition very well in a way that most of the definitions do not mention: (gender, type, discrimination, characteristics, form) of myth although they are not comprehensive, inclusive or prohibitive. paper method: This paper relies on the method (descriptive - analytical).

TwejerVol. 7(4)
Soran University (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Cultural and Sociopolitical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Critical Reading of the Definition of Myth in Kurdish Literature — Sirwan Jabbar Amin · Twejer (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS