On the (Ir)Relevance of Discount Factors for Future Allocations of Scarce Resources

ABSTRACT This article is interested in future allocations of scarce resources in an environment where upper bounds and lower bounds are fixed on the stream of consumptions or extractions of the scarce resource. It is shown that the optimal planning of consumptions does not depend on the sequence of discounting factors as soon as they are decreasing at a rate smaller than a bound linked to the concavity of the utility function and the choice of the sequences of lower and upper bounds. The optimal solution is unique and exhibits two regimes with a pivotal period in the middle. Therefore, one gets plans satisfying some kind of intergenerational fairness: the upper bounds prevent the first generations from consuming too much of the resource to the detriment of future generations and the lower bounds ensure minimal consumption for these generations. We also consider the role of the horizon and of a potential regret after a revision for the bounds. The argument is then extended to partially renewable resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Economic Theory
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70053
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the (Ir)Relevance of Discount Factors for Future Allocations of Scarce Resources

Jean‐Pierre Drugeon, Alain Chateauneuf, Jean‐Marc Bonnisseau
1 citations
Journal of Public Economic Theory
Climate Change Policy and Economics
3.13
article

On the (Ir)Relevance of Discount Factors for Future Allocations of Scarce Resources

Jean‐Pierre Drugeon, Alain Chateauneuf, Jean‐Marc Bonnisseau
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article is interested in future allocations of scarce resources in an environment where upper bounds and lower bounds are fixed on the stream of consumptions or extractions of the scarce resource. It is shown that the optimal planning of consumptions does not depend on the sequence of discounting factors as soon as they are decreasing at a rate smaller than a bound linked to the concavity of the utility function and the choice of the sequences of lower and upper bounds. The optimal solution is unique and exhibits two regimes with a pivotal period in the middle. Therefore, one gets plans satisfying some kind of intergenerational fairness: the upper bounds prevent the first generations from consuming too much of the resource to the detriment of future generations and the lower bounds ensure minimal consumption for these generations. We also consider the role of the horizon and of a potential regret after a revision for the bounds. The argument is then extended to partially renewable resources.

Journal of Public Economic TheoryVol. 27(4)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne (FR), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR), Paris School of Economics (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.