Listening and Responding Lead to Better Outcomes: Building the Evidence Base for High-Quality Listening Practice

A growing number of grantmaking institutions (GMIs) recognize that listening to communities in which they invest—especially those to, and most affected by, the challenges being addressed—is crucial to achieve their equity goals. Despite investments and intent to listen, there is a gap in implementation. Genuine listening for equity requires that foundation leaders view the shift as adaptive and not merely technical. A technical change entails adoption of specified methods whereas adaptive changes require a fundamental shift in values and beliefs. Solely implementing new “listening” techniques without shifting values and beliefs could leave gaps between intention and action. But current resources on listening for equity stop short of describing the necessary mindsets and how they manifest when applied in practice. In this paper, we provide a description of three mindsets and related practices GMIs can use for authentic listening, offering the Hartford Foundation for Public Giving as a case study.

Publication Details

Journal
The Foundation Review
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9707/1944-5660.1734
Primary Topic
Communication in Education and Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Listening and Responding Lead to Better Outcomes: Building the Evidence Base for High-Quality Listening Practice

The Foundation Review
Communication in Education and Healthcare
article

Listening and Responding Lead to Better Outcomes: Building the Evidence Base for High-Quality Listening Practice

article en

Abstract

A growing number of grantmaking institutions (GMIs) recognize that listening to communities in which they invest—especially those to, and most affected by, the challenges being addressed—is crucial to achieve their equity goals. Despite investments and intent to listen, there is a gap in implementation. Genuine listening for equity requires that foundation leaders view the shift as adaptive and not merely technical. A technical change entails adoption of specified methods whereas adaptive changes require a fundamental shift in values and beliefs. Solely implementing new “listening” techniques without shifting values and beliefs could leave gaps between intention and action. But current resources on listening for equity stop short of describing the necessary mindsets and how they manifest when applied in practice. In this paper, we provide a description of three mindsets and related practices GMIs can use for authentic listening, offering the Hartford Foundation for Public Giving as a case study.

The Foundation ReviewVol. 17(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Communication in Education and Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.