Description of typical components of the ERP when solving the task of distinguishing short intervals of time

<p><strong>Context and relevance.</strong> This article is one of a series of works published as part of a major research project devoted to the study of the procedural characteristics of learning. <strong>Methods and materials.</strong> Based on the Signal Detection Theory and the “Yes-No” task method with EEG recording was previously developed and tested to study the dynamics of the processes of acquisition/improvement of a skill of distinguishing short intervals of time. The <strong>objective</strong> of the study was to identify and describe typical components of event-related potentials (ERPs) during the presentation of the estimated signal in leads F-, C-, P-, and O- for the analysis of the brain support of learning process in different groups experiment: acquired, <em>not</em> acquired, improved, and <em>not</em> improved the skill. The sample consisted of 17 people (5 men, 12 women, 18—45 years old, med — 19). <strong>Results.</strong> A task-specific configuration of ERP components was identified, occurring in all leads in all study participants. <strong>Conclusions. </strong>Reliable and stable differences in the amplitude and latent period values of individual some components between leads F-, C- and P-, O- were obtained for the entire sample. No significant differences were found in the amplitude-time characteristics of the components extracted from participants from different groups.</p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Experimental Psychology (Russia)
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2025180203
Primary Topic
Advanced Research in Systems and Signal Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Description of typical components of the ERP when solving the task of distinguishing short intervals of time

D.L. Gladilin, Konstantin Yudakov, Vladimir Apanovich, Юрий И. Александров et al.
Experimental Psychology (Russia)
Advanced Research in Systems and Signal Processing
article

Description of typical components of the ERP when solving the task of distinguishing short intervals of time

D.L. Gladilin, Konstantin Yudakov, Vladimir Apanovich, Юрий И. Александров, E.A. Aramyan
article en

Abstract

<p><strong>Context and relevance.</strong> This article is one of a series of works published as part of a major research project devoted to the study of the procedural characteristics of learning. <strong>Methods and materials.</strong> Based on the Signal Detection Theory and the “Yes-No” task method with EEG recording was previously developed and tested to study the dynamics of the processes of acquisition/improvement of a skill of distinguishing short intervals of time. The <strong>objective</strong> of the study was to identify and describe typical components of event-related potentials (ERPs) during the presentation of the estimated signal in leads F-, C-, P-, and O- for the analysis of the brain support of learning process in different groups experiment: acquired, <em>not</em> acquired, improved, and <em>not</em> improved the skill. The sample consisted of 17 people (5 men, 12 women, 18—45 years old, med — 19). <strong>Results.</strong> A task-specific configuration of ERP components was identified, occurring in all leads in all study participants. <strong>Conclusions. </strong>Reliable and stable differences in the amplitude and latent period values of individual some components between leads F-, C- and P-, O- were obtained for the entire sample. No significant differences were found in the amplitude-time characteristics of the components extracted from participants from different groups.</p>

Experimental Psychology (Russia)Vol. 18(2)
Institute of Psychology (RU)
Russian Science Foundation, Russian Academy of Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Advanced Research in Systems and Signal Processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.