The Role of Theory in University Evaluation Coursework

This paper examines how theory is conveyed to novice evaluators in university coursework, providing a new perspective on the role of theory in evaluation. Using a survey of university evaluation instructors in the United States, the authors examined instructor perspectives on the role of evaluation theory as well as the evaluation content in assigned textbooks. Analysis indicated a similar lack of coherence and consistency in the use of theory to that seen in evaluation practice. The findings support three takeaways for evaluation educators, practitioners, and scholars. First, the field must continue to clarify the role of theory in evaluation. Second, an in-depth analysis of authors’ approaches to discussing theory in textbooks is warranted. Third, textbook authors and publishers could consider the themes that emerged from instructors’ responses to inform book proposals and revisions of textbook editions to better suit the range of instructor needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v21i51.853
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Theory in University Evaluation Coursework

David T. Marshall, Divya Varier, Kathleen Kuehn
Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

The Role of Theory in University Evaluation Coursework

David T. Marshall, Divya Varier, Kathleen Kuehn
article en

Abstract

This paper examines how theory is conveyed to novice evaluators in university coursework, providing a new perspective on the role of theory in evaluation. Using a survey of university evaluation instructors in the United States, the authors examined instructor perspectives on the role of evaluation theory as well as the evaluation content in assigned textbooks. Analysis indicated a similar lack of coherence and consistency in the use of theory to that seen in evaluation practice. The findings support three takeaways for evaluation educators, practitioners, and scholars. First, the field must continue to clarify the role of theory in evaluation. Second, an in-depth analysis of authors’ approaches to discussing theory in textbooks is warranted. Third, textbook authors and publishers could consider the themes that emerged from instructors’ responses to inform book proposals and revisions of textbook editions to better suit the range of instructor needs.

Journal of MultiDisciplinary EvaluationVol. 21(51)
George Mason University (US), Auburn University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.