Hyper-Organization and Myths of Community

It is common to depict an opposition between formal organization and solidary community. Contemporary society-wide rationalization constructs organizations as modern purposive actors, or hyper-organizations, operating under high uncertainty environments and with multiple stakeholder interactions. This, we argue, tends to partially reconstruct organizations, their components, and their environments and stakeholders as diffuse and abstract, yet purposive communities. Our arguments and observations suggest a broad shift toward displays of contemporary forms of community. Organizations that depict themselves as more empowered, committed, responsible, and purposive social actors use the term “community” more. Further, the depiction of “community” is highly abstract, rather than a traditional form linked to concrete local geographies or social groups. Overall, we suggest that rationalization in the society of organizations paradoxically generates supra-rational celebration of emotive notions such as community. We find support for our argument in the analyses of 300 annual reports representing 80 large, public United States companies over the period 1960 to 2010.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organization Studies
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406251370491
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hyper-Organization and Myths of Community

Patricia Bromley, Andrea Geißinger, John W. Meyer
Organization Studies
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Hyper-Organization and Myths of Community

Patricia Bromley, Andrea Geißinger, John W. Meyer
article en

Abstract

It is common to depict an opposition between formal organization and solidary community. Contemporary society-wide rationalization constructs organizations as modern purposive actors, or hyper-organizations, operating under high uncertainty environments and with multiple stakeholder interactions. This, we argue, tends to partially reconstruct organizations, their components, and their environments and stakeholders as diffuse and abstract, yet purposive communities. Our arguments and observations suggest a broad shift toward displays of contemporary forms of community. Organizations that depict themselves as more empowered, committed, responsible, and purposive social actors use the term “community” more. Further, the depiction of “community” is highly abstract, rather than a traditional form linked to concrete local geographies or social groups. Overall, we suggest that rationalization in the society of organizations paradoxically generates supra-rational celebration of emotive notions such as community. We find support for our argument in the analyses of 300 annual reports representing 80 large, public United States companies over the period 1960 to 2010.

Organization Studies
San Jose State University (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hyper-Organization and Myths of Community — Patricia Bromley, Andrea Geißinger, et al. · Organization Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS