Advanced oxidation processes for spent caustic wastewater treatment: A systematic review of efficiency, challenges, and future perspectives

Spent caustic wastewater (SCWW) is a highly alkaline and toxic effluent produced mainly by the refinery and petrochemical industries. It contains elevated levels of sulfides, phenols, and refractory organics, presenting significant challenges for conventional treatment methods. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) encompass a range of highly efficient techniques employed to treat SCWW. This systematic review assesses the most commonly applied AOPs for treating SCWW, compares their treatment efficiencies based on existing findings, and provides recommendations to guide future research. Sixteen studies were analyzed in this review, focusing on six AOP techniques: conventional Fenton, electro-Fenton (EF), electro-photo-Fenton (EPF), electro-Peroxone (EP), photocatalysis, and sulfate radical-based AOPs (SR-AOPs). The EF process has been the most frequently studied process, and EPF demonstrated the highest COD removal efficiency. Furthermore, the sulfidic form of SCWW was identified as the most prevalent type. In addition, this review emphasizes the importance of optimizing operational parameters such as pH, reaction time, and oxidant or catalyst dosage to maximize efficiency and prevent the formation of hazardous by-products. • AOPs show strong potential for large-scale SCWW treatment. • Electro-Fenton (EF) process was the most frequently studied for SCWW treatment. • Electro-photo-Fenton yielded the highest COD removal efficiency across the studies. • Combining AOPs with bio-treatment is recommended to improve cost-effectiveness. • AOPs are rated by COD removal, cost, waste generation, pH needs, and scalability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Published
2025-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2025.104436
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Advanced oxidation water treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advanced oxidation processes for spent caustic wastewater treatment: A systematic review of efficiency, challenges, and future perspectives

Felipe de J. Silerio-Vázquez, Mohammad Ahmadi, Babak Kakavandi, Raf Dewil et al.
6 citations
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Advanced oxidation water treatment
4.90
article

Advanced oxidation processes for spent caustic wastewater treatment: A systematic review of efficiency, challenges, and future perspectives

Felipe de J. Silerio-Vázquez, Mohammad Ahmadi, Babak Kakavandi, Raf Dewil, Kamyar Yaghmaeian
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Spent caustic wastewater (SCWW) is a highly alkaline and toxic effluent produced mainly by the refinery and petrochemical industries. It contains elevated levels of sulfides, phenols, and refractory organics, presenting significant challenges for conventional treatment methods. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) encompass a range of highly efficient techniques employed to treat SCWW. This systematic review assesses the most commonly applied AOPs for treating SCWW, compares their treatment efficiencies based on existing findings, and provides recommendations to guide future research. Sixteen studies were analyzed in this review, focusing on six AOP techniques: conventional Fenton, electro-Fenton (EF), electro-photo-Fenton (EPF), electro-Peroxone (EP), photocatalysis, and sulfate radical-based AOPs (SR-AOPs). The EF process has been the most frequently studied process, and EPF demonstrated the highest COD removal efficiency. Furthermore, the sulfidic form of SCWW was identified as the most prevalent type. In addition, this review emphasizes the importance of optimizing operational parameters such as pH, reaction time, and oxidant or catalyst dosage to maximize efficiency and prevent the formation of hazardous by-products. • AOPs show strong potential for large-scale SCWW treatment. • Electro-Fenton (EF) process was the most frequently studied for SCWW treatment. • Electro-photo-Fenton yielded the highest COD removal efficiency across the studies. • Combining AOPs with bio-treatment is recommended to improve cost-effectiveness. • AOPs are rated by COD removal, cost, waste generation, pH needs, and scalability.

Environmental Technology & InnovationVol. 40
University of Oxford (GB), Jahrom University of Medical Sciences (IR), Science Oxford (GB), Alborz University of Medical Sciences (IR), Instituto Politécnico Nacional (MX), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR), KU Leuven (BE)
Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Advanced oxidation water treatment
4.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.