The Emergence of Power: A Feedback-Based Model of Influence, Reputation, and Social Norms

This paper develops a procedural model to formalize the emergence of power as an emergent property of decentralized social feedback, imitation, and influence dynamics. Building on prior models of norm emergence, we extend the framework to incorporate heterogeneous influence weights reflecting agents' symbolic standing and material resources. In doing so, we bridge classical sociological theories of power—including Weberian authority, Bourdieuian capital, and Emersonian dependence—with a tractable microfoundational mechanism grounded in reward-sensitive behavior and reputational dynamics. We demonstrate how differential weighting of social feedback leads to the stabilization of power hierarchies and centralized influence within groups. The model formalizes power as a process rather than a static attribute, providing a unified account of how influence asymmetries emerge, persist, and shape collective action. By clarifying the procedural underpinnings of power emergence, our contribution advances the understanding of influence, authority, and social structure, laying groundwork for cumulative theory-building.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/tg8bx_v1
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Emergence of Power: A Feedback-Based Model of Influence, Reputation, and Social Norms

Peter Marbach, S. S. Jiang
Management and Organizational Studies
article

The Emergence of Power: A Feedback-Based Model of Influence, Reputation, and Social Norms

Peter Marbach, S. S. Jiang
article en

Abstract

This paper develops a procedural model to formalize the emergence of power as an emergent property of decentralized social feedback, imitation, and influence dynamics. Building on prior models of norm emergence, we extend the framework to incorporate heterogeneous influence weights reflecting agents' symbolic standing and material resources. In doing so, we bridge classical sociological theories of power—including Weberian authority, Bourdieuian capital, and Emersonian dependence—with a tractable microfoundational mechanism grounded in reward-sensitive behavior and reputational dynamics. We demonstrate how differential weighting of social feedback leads to the stabilization of power hierarchies and centralized influence within groups. The model formalizes power as a process rather than a static attribute, providing a unified account of how influence asymmetries emerge, persist, and shape collective action. By clarifying the procedural underpinnings of power emergence, our contribution advances the understanding of influence, authority, and social structure, laying groundwork for cumulative theory-building.

Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.