Gender and sexual minority PhD students experience epistemic exclusion in STEM

Abstract People with gender minority (e.g., transgender, agender, nonbinary) and sexual minority (e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual, asexual, queer) identities are underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). In the current research, we examine whether gender and sexual minorities report greater epistemic exclusion (i.e., institutional devaluation of their contributions) and worse academic outcomes compared to their cisgender and heterosexual peers. In a survey of 329 PhD students, we find that students who identified as gender and/or sexual minorities were more likely to experience epistemic exclusion, report greater stress in graduate school, and intend to leave their PhD programs (relative to their cisgender and heterosexual counterparts). Importantly, we found this pattern both within and outside of STEM. This research highlights how epistemic exclusion can serve as a barrier to gender and sexual minorities’ success, not only in STEM, but in academia more broadly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.70022
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender and sexual minority PhD students experience epistemic exclusion in STEM

Grace Flores‐Robles, Kyle Anderson, Elissia T. Franklin, Katlyn Lee Milless et al.
1 citations
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Social and Intergroup Psychology
4.20
article

Gender and sexual minority PhD students experience epistemic exclusion in STEM

Grace Flores‐Robles, Kyle Anderson, Elissia T. Franklin, Katlyn Lee Milless, Rachel A. Fikslin, Bryant N. Gomez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract People with gender minority (e.g., transgender, agender, nonbinary) and sexual minority (e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual, asexual, queer) identities are underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). In the current research, we examine whether gender and sexual minorities report greater epistemic exclusion (i.e., institutional devaluation of their contributions) and worse academic outcomes compared to their cisgender and heterosexual peers. In a survey of 329 PhD students, we find that students who identified as gender and/or sexual minorities were more likely to experience epistemic exclusion, report greater stress in graduate school, and intend to leave their PhD programs (relative to their cisgender and heterosexual counterparts). Importantly, we found this pattern both within and outside of STEM. This research highlights how epistemic exclusion can serve as a barrier to gender and sexual minorities’ success, not only in STEM, but in academia more broadly.

Analyses of Social Issues and Public PolicyVol. 25(2)
The Graduate Center, CUNY (US), Seton Hall University (US), United States Gypsum (United States) (US), Silent Spring Institute (US), Mathematica Policy Research (US)
Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Gender and sexual minority PhD students experience epistemic exclusion in STEM — Grace Flores‐Robles, Kyle Anderson, et al. · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS