Comparison and Insights of Domestic and International Models for Assessing the Quality of Curriculum Implementation

In the context of the globalization of education, the assessment of the quality of curriculum implementation is of paramount importance. Curriculum monitoring in the United States, South Africa and New Zealand has its own characteristics and rich experience in terms of assessment systems, methods, subject participation and application of results. In China, there are problems in this field, such as focusing on academic performance, single assessment method, uneven participation of subjects and limited application of results. Through comparative studies, China should build a comprehensive assessment system and include indicators such as core literacy; innovate assessment methods and strengthen the application of technology; expand assessment subjects and improve their participation; and strengthen the application of results and feedback mechanisms. In the future, it is necessary to pay close attention to international developments, deepen the reform in the light of national conditions, and explore the assessment model with Chinese characteristics, so as to improve the quality of curriculum implementation and promote educational equity and the cultivation of innovative talents.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Education Study
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35534/es.0707147
Primary Topic
Higher Education Learning Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison and Insights of Domestic and International Models for Assessing the Quality of Curriculum Implementation

Tian Dan
Education Study
Higher Education Learning Practices
article

Comparison and Insights of Domestic and International Models for Assessing the Quality of Curriculum Implementation

Tian Dan
article en

Abstract

In the context of the globalization of education, the assessment of the quality of curriculum implementation is of paramount importance. Curriculum monitoring in the United States, South Africa and New Zealand has its own characteristics and rich experience in terms of assessment systems, methods, subject participation and application of results. In China, there are problems in this field, such as focusing on academic performance, single assessment method, uneven participation of subjects and limited application of results. Through comparative studies, China should build a comprehensive assessment system and include indicators such as core literacy; innovate assessment methods and strengthen the application of technology; expand assessment subjects and improve their participation; and strengthen the application of results and feedback mechanisms. In the future, it is necessary to pay close attention to international developments, deepen the reform in the light of national conditions, and explore the assessment model with Chinese characteristics, so as to improve the quality of curriculum implementation and promote educational equity and the cultivation of innovative talents.

Education StudyVol. 7(7)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Higher Education Learning Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.