Class-based taxation: the fiscal paternalism of the Chilean income tax?

Abstract This article analyzes the history of the Chilean personal income tax (PIT) to explain the persistence of a class-based and progressive PIT within a context of a regressive fiscal system. We provide new archival evidence regarding fiscal politics since the nineteenth century to estimate the generalization of the PIT between 1925 and 2014. Combining statistical information and parliamentary records, we follow the PIT’s trajectory in relation to elites’ self-interest, paternalistic understandings of the fiscal pact and citizenship, and the looming presence of natural resources. By keeping the PIT class-based, allegedly to protect workers, fiscal politics defined citizenship through expenditure instead of taxation. Those excluded from income taxation bear the brunt of indirect taxes—which support social spending—albeit without voice over fiscal policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0212610925100578
Primary Topic
Taxation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Class-based taxation: the fiscal paternalism of the Chilean income tax?

Jorge Atria, José Tomás Labarca, Andrés Biehl
Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History
Taxation and Compliance Studies
article

Class-based taxation: the fiscal paternalism of the Chilean income tax?

Jorge Atria, José Tomás Labarca, Andrés Biehl
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article analyzes the history of the Chilean personal income tax (PIT) to explain the persistence of a class-based and progressive PIT within a context of a regressive fiscal system. We provide new archival evidence regarding fiscal politics since the nineteenth century to estimate the generalization of the PIT between 1925 and 2014. Combining statistical information and parliamentary records, we follow the PIT’s trajectory in relation to elites’ self-interest, paternalistic understandings of the fiscal pact and citizenship, and the looming presence of natural resources. By keeping the PIT class-based, allegedly to protect workers, fiscal politics defined citizenship through expenditure instead of taxation. Those excluded from income taxation bear the brunt of indirect taxes—which support social spending—albeit without voice over fiscal policies.

Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic HistoryVol. 43(2)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), University of Cambridge (GB)
Isaac Newton Trust, Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo, Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Taxation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Class-based taxation: the fiscal paternalism of the Chilean income tax? — Jorge Atria, José Tomás Labarca, et al. · Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS