Academic administration factors affecting blended learning system for colleges in Henan province

This study investigates academic administration factors affecting the implementation of blended learning systems in colleges across Henan Province, China. Blended learning, integrating face-to-face instruction with online components, is gaining traction as a flexible and personalized educational approach. However, challenges such as faculty preparedness, resource disparities, and inconsistent system necessitate robust administrative strategies. Using a mixed-methods design, the study surveyed 502 teachers and administrators across 60 colleges and conducted semi-structured interviews with nine experts. Quantitative analysis revealed moderate overall levels of academic administration factors (M=3.49) and blended learning system (M=3.54). Learning Participation (M=3.63) and Teaching Methods (M=3.59) were rated highest, while Teacher Evaluation (M=3.24) and External Environment (M=3.28) scored lowest. Regression analysis identified Teaching Effectiveness (β=0.24) and Learning Participation (β=0.42) as key predictors, explaining 65% of the variance in learning system. Qualitative findings highlighted infrastructure disparities, faculty training gaps, and overreliance on summative assessments. Recommendations include upgrading technological infrastructure, implementing faculty development programs, and redesigning assessment systems to enhance equity and learning quality. The study contributes to blended learning literature by contextualizing these challenges within Henan’s educational landscape and offers actionable guidelines for improving system effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55214/2576-8484.v9i8.9365
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Academic administration factors affecting blended learning system for colleges in Henan province

Suttipong Boonphadung, Xudong Chen, Thada Siththada
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology
Online and Blended Learning
article

Academic administration factors affecting blended learning system for colleges in Henan province

Suttipong Boonphadung, Xudong Chen, Thada Siththada
article en

Abstract

This study investigates academic administration factors affecting the implementation of blended learning systems in colleges across Henan Province, China. Blended learning, integrating face-to-face instruction with online components, is gaining traction as a flexible and personalized educational approach. However, challenges such as faculty preparedness, resource disparities, and inconsistent system necessitate robust administrative strategies. Using a mixed-methods design, the study surveyed 502 teachers and administrators across 60 colleges and conducted semi-structured interviews with nine experts. Quantitative analysis revealed moderate overall levels of academic administration factors (M=3.49) and blended learning system (M=3.54). Learning Participation (M=3.63) and Teaching Methods (M=3.59) were rated highest, while Teacher Evaluation (M=3.24) and External Environment (M=3.28) scored lowest. Regression analysis identified Teaching Effectiveness (β=0.24) and Learning Participation (β=0.42) as key predictors, explaining 65% of the variance in learning system. Qualitative findings highlighted infrastructure disparities, faculty training gaps, and overreliance on summative assessments. Recommendations include upgrading technological infrastructure, implementing faculty development programs, and redesigning assessment systems to enhance equity and learning quality. The study contributes to blended learning literature by contextualizing these challenges within Henan’s educational landscape and offers actionable guidelines for improving system effectiveness.

Edelweiss Applied Science and TechnologyVol. 9(8)
Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University (TH)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Online and Blended Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.