Environmental justice in ecosystem restoration frameworks

Ecosystem restoration projects are happening frequently around the globe, driven in part by an increased awareness of the importance of healthy ecosystems to humans. These projects play an important role in mitigating the negative environmental impacts that vulnerable communities face. However, no clear frameworks exist on how restoration can be developed in ways that explicitly prioritize environmentally just processes and outcomes. While some frameworks exist that include principles of engagement and the use of multiple knowledge types, there remains a need for the intentional and specific inclusion of environmental justice in restoration frameworks. Restoration frameworks are prescriptive models that provide steps to guide restoration efforts of researchers, activists, and governments. Here we present a systematic literature review of restoration frameworks that represent research conducted across the globe with restoration test sites from nearly every continent. The majority of restoration frameworks currently fail to incorporate justice principles into any phase of restoration, nor do they prioritize justice as a process or outcome. Environmentally just frameworks need to integrate multiple types of justice including recognition, procedural justice, and distributive justice, as well as community empowerment in decision‐making. To address the lack of these aspects in current restoration frameworks, we propose a novel framework that incorporates these key principles of environmental justice into the restoration planning and implementation process. The intentional incorporation of environmental justice practices into ideation, scoping, and implementation can greatly increase the benefits of restoration to vulnerable communities while fostering ecosystem health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2025-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70165
Primary Topic
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental justice in ecosystem restoration frameworks

P. Joshua Griffin, Joseph Clemens, Jennifer L. Ruesink, Eréndira Aceves‐Bueno et al.
Restoration Ecology
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
article

Environmental justice in ecosystem restoration frameworks

P. Joshua Griffin, Joseph Clemens, Jennifer L. Ruesink, Eréndira Aceves‐Bueno, Cinde Donoghue
article en

Abstract

Ecosystem restoration projects are happening frequently around the globe, driven in part by an increased awareness of the importance of healthy ecosystems to humans. These projects play an important role in mitigating the negative environmental impacts that vulnerable communities face. However, no clear frameworks exist on how restoration can be developed in ways that explicitly prioritize environmentally just processes and outcomes. While some frameworks exist that include principles of engagement and the use of multiple knowledge types, there remains a need for the intentional and specific inclusion of environmental justice in restoration frameworks. Restoration frameworks are prescriptive models that provide steps to guide restoration efforts of researchers, activists, and governments. Here we present a systematic literature review of restoration frameworks that represent research conducted across the globe with restoration test sites from nearly every continent. The majority of restoration frameworks currently fail to incorporate justice principles into any phase of restoration, nor do they prioritize justice as a process or outcome. Environmentally just frameworks need to integrate multiple types of justice including recognition, procedural justice, and distributive justice, as well as community empowerment in decision‐making. To address the lack of these aspects in current restoration frameworks, we propose a novel framework that incorporates these key principles of environmental justice into the restoration planning and implementation process. The intentional incorporation of environmental justice practices into ideation, scoping, and implementation can greatly increase the benefits of restoration to vulnerable communities while fostering ecosystem health.

Restoration Ecology
Washington State Department of Ecology (US), University of Washington (US), University of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.