Ústavněprávní vymezení práva na samosprávu ve vybraných zemích střední Evropy

This paper analyses the constitutional definition of the right to self-government in the Republic of Austria, the Federal Republic of Germany and the Swiss Confederation. These are Central European countries in which there was no legal discontinuity between 1948 and 1989. The content of the right to territorial self-government is therefore broader and more detailed in the countries under review than in the Czech Republic. The article aims in particular to present those aspects of the right to self-government that do not exist in the Czech Republic. The common feature of the countries under consideration is the institutional protection of local self-government, under which the municipality as a type, and not each municipality, is protected. On the other hand, differences include the different content and degree of guarantees for local government units at the federal level in relation to the state and cantonal levels. The federal level is strongest in the Republic of Austria, while it is weakest in the Swiss Co

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurisprudence
Published
2025-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71372/sgmg2200
Primary Topic
Ombudsman and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ústavněprávní vymezení práva na samosprávu ve vybraných zemích střední Evropy

Philip Schlesinger
Jurisprudence
Ombudsman and Human Rights
article

Ústavněprávní vymezení práva na samosprávu ve vybraných zemích střední Evropy

Philip Schlesinger
article en

Abstract

This paper analyses the constitutional definition of the right to self-government in the Republic of Austria, the Federal Republic of Germany and the Swiss Confederation. These are Central European countries in which there was no legal discontinuity between 1948 and 1989. The content of the right to territorial self-government is therefore broader and more detailed in the countries under review than in the Czech Republic. The article aims in particular to present those aspects of the right to self-government that do not exist in the Czech Republic. The common feature of the countries under consideration is the institutional protection of local self-government, under which the municipality as a type, and not each municipality, is protected. On the other hand, differences include the different content and degree of guarantees for local government units at the federal level in relation to the state and cantonal levels. The federal level is strongest in the Republic of Austria, while it is weakest in the Swiss Co

Jurisprudence(3)
Charles University (CZ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Ombudsman and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ústavněprávní vymezení práva na samosprávu ve vybraných zemích střední Evropy — Philip Schlesinger · Jurisprudence (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS