Linear reactive control of jet installation noise

This paper presents an experimental application of reactive control to jet installation noise based on destructive interference. The work is motivated by the success of previous studies in applying this control approach to mixing layers (Sasaki et al. Theor. 2018 b Comput. Fluid Dyn . 32 , 765–788), boundary layers (Brito et al. 2021 Exp. Fluids 62 , 1–13; Audiffred et al. 2023 Phys. Rev. Fluids 8 , 073902), flow over a backward-facing step (Martini et al. 2022 J. Fluid Mech . 937 , A19) and, more recently, to turbulent jets (Maia et al. 2021 Phys. Rev. Fluids 6 , 123901; Maia et al. 2022 Phys. Rev. Fluids 7 , 033903; Audiffred et al. 2024b J. Fluid Mech . 994 , A15). We exploit the fact that jet–surface interaction noise is underpinned by wavepackets that can be modelled in a linear framework and develop a linear control strategy where piezoelectric actuators situated at the edge of a scattering surface are driven in real time by sensor measurements in the near field of the jet, the objective being to reduce noise radiated in the acoustic field. The control mechanism involves imposition of an anti-dipole at the trailing edge to cancel the scattering dipole that arises due to an incident wavepacket perturbation. We explore two different control strategies: (i) the inverse feed-forward approach, where causality is imposed by truncating the control kernel, and (ii) the Wiener–Hopf approach, where causality is optimally enforced in building the control kernel. We show that the Wiener–Hopf approach has better performance than that obtained using the truncated inverse feed-forward kernel. We also explore different positions of the near-field sensors and show that control performance is better for sensors installed for streamwise positions downstream in the jet plume, where the signature of hydrodynamic wavepacket is better captured by the sensors. Broadband noise reductions of up to 50 % are achieved.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2025.10480
Primary Topic
Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linear reactive control of jet installation noise

Peter Jordan, Anton Lebedev, Diego B. S. Audiffred, Matteo Mancinelli et al.
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
article

Linear reactive control of jet installation noise

Peter Jordan, Anton Lebedev, Diego B. S. Audiffred, Matteo Mancinelli, Eduardo Martini, André V. G. Cavalieri
article en

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental application of reactive control to jet installation noise based on destructive interference. The work is motivated by the success of previous studies in applying this control approach to mixing layers (Sasaki et al. Theor. 2018 b Comput. Fluid Dyn . 32 , 765–788), boundary layers (Brito et al. 2021 Exp. Fluids 62 , 1–13; Audiffred et al. 2023 Phys. Rev. Fluids 8 , 073902), flow over a backward-facing step (Martini et al. 2022 J. Fluid Mech . 937 , A19) and, more recently, to turbulent jets (Maia et al. 2021 Phys. Rev. Fluids 6 , 123901; Maia et al. 2022 Phys. Rev. Fluids 7 , 033903; Audiffred et al. 2024b J. Fluid Mech . 994 , A15). We exploit the fact that jet–surface interaction noise is underpinned by wavepackets that can be modelled in a linear framework and develop a linear control strategy where piezoelectric actuators situated at the edge of a scattering surface are driven in real time by sensor measurements in the near field of the jet, the objective being to reduce noise radiated in the acoustic field. The control mechanism involves imposition of an anti-dipole at the trailing edge to cancel the scattering dipole that arises due to an incident wavepacket perturbation. We explore two different control strategies: (i) the inverse feed-forward approach, where causality is imposed by truncating the control kernel, and (ii) the Wiener–Hopf approach, where causality is optimally enforced in building the control kernel. We show that the Wiener–Hopf approach has better performance than that obtained using the truncated inverse feed-forward kernel. We also explore different positions of the near-field sensors and show that control performance is better for sensors installed for streamwise positions downstream in the jet plume, where the signature of hydrodynamic wavepacket is better captured by the sensors. Broadband noise reductions of up to 50 % are achieved.

Journal of Fluid MechanicsVol. 1017
Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (BR), Roma Tre University (IT), Université de Poitiers (FR)
Horizon 2020
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.