Experimental methods: Eliciting and measuring social norms

Eliciting social norms is essential for understanding a range of behaviors in economic contexts. This paper reviews key experimental approaches to social-norm measurement, comparing the methods, practical considerations, and specific conditions under which each is most effective. We discuss various social norm elicitation techniques, including coordination-based, opinion-based, and distributional approaches. Our findings suggest that coordination-game approaches are the most widely adopted and tested; they deliver robust results, particularly in contexts with a single dominant norm. Importantly, while early methods focused on eliciting mean or modal normative beliefs, recent work shifts focus to eliciting beliefs about the distribution of normative beliefs. This allows the researcher to draw inferences on the degree of uncertainty that underlies norm assessments. This paper aims to help experimentalists and practitioners choose suitable norm-elicitation methods that are aligned with research objectives and logistical constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107187
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental methods: Eliciting and measuring social norms

Uri Gneezy, Eugen Dimant, Erin L. Krupka, Gary Charness
2 citations
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
4.73
article

Experimental methods: Eliciting and measuring social norms

Uri Gneezy, Eugen Dimant, Erin L. Krupka, Gary Charness
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Eliciting social norms is essential for understanding a range of behaviors in economic contexts. This paper reviews key experimental approaches to social-norm measurement, comparing the methods, practical considerations, and specific conditions under which each is most effective. We discuss various social norm elicitation techniques, including coordination-based, opinion-based, and distributional approaches. Our findings suggest that coordination-game approaches are the most widely adopted and tested; they deliver robust results, particularly in contexts with a single dominant norm. Importantly, while early methods focused on eliciting mean or modal normative beliefs, recent work shifts focus to eliciting beliefs about the distribution of normative beliefs. This allows the researcher to draw inferences on the degree of uncertainty that underlies norm assessments. This paper aims to help experimentalists and practitioners choose suitable norm-elicitation methods that are aligned with research objectives and logistical constraints.

Journal of Economic Behavior & OrganizationVol. 237
University of California, Santa Barbara (US), University of Michigan (US), University of California San Diego (US), California University of Pennsylvania (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.