The Impact of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems on Good Governance in Local Government: Evidence from South Africa

This study investigates the critical role of Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) systems in enhancing good governance and performance within local government structures in South Africa. Despite policy initiatives to strengthen oversight, many municipalities continue to exhibit signs of dysfunction, with weak accountability mechanisms and fragmented performance management processes. Using a quantitative research design grounded in the Theory of Change (ToC) and the Government-Wide Monitoring and Evaluation System (GWMES), the paper evaluates the structure, reach, and effectiveness of existing M&E practices across five municipalities in the North West Province. Results highlight that while M&E is widely recognised as essential for good governance, its implementation is hindered by inadequate institutional frameworks, poor data management, and limited public participation. The findings emphasise the need for a consolidated, participatory M&E model that is embedded within governance structures such as Ward Committees, Municipal Public Accounts Committees (MPACs), and Internal Audit Units. By integrating feedback mechanisms and stakeholder engagement into performance management systems, municipalities can enhance transparency, responsiveness, and public trust. This paper contributes to the growing body of knowledge on local governance by offering empirical evidence and strategic recommendations for the institutionalisation of effective M&E systems that promote sustainable service delivery and democratic accountability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Global Journal of Political Science and Administration
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37745/gjpsa.2013/vol13n317
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems on Good Governance in Local Government: Evidence from South Africa

Sagaren Pillay, Makhishi George Marindi
Global Journal of Political Science and Administration
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

The Impact of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems on Good Governance in Local Government: Evidence from South Africa

Sagaren Pillay, Makhishi George Marindi
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the critical role of Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) systems in enhancing good governance and performance within local government structures in South Africa. Despite policy initiatives to strengthen oversight, many municipalities continue to exhibit signs of dysfunction, with weak accountability mechanisms and fragmented performance management processes. Using a quantitative research design grounded in the Theory of Change (ToC) and the Government-Wide Monitoring and Evaluation System (GWMES), the paper evaluates the structure, reach, and effectiveness of existing M&E practices across five municipalities in the North West Province. Results highlight that while M&E is widely recognised as essential for good governance, its implementation is hindered by inadequate institutional frameworks, poor data management, and limited public participation. The findings emphasise the need for a consolidated, participatory M&E model that is embedded within governance structures such as Ward Committees, Municipal Public Accounts Committees (MPACs), and Internal Audit Units. By integrating feedback mechanisms and stakeholder engagement into performance management systems, municipalities can enhance transparency, responsiveness, and public trust. This paper contributes to the growing body of knowledge on local governance by offering empirical evidence and strategic recommendations for the institutionalisation of effective M&E systems that promote sustainable service delivery and democratic accountability.

Global Journal of Political Science and AdministrationVol. 13(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.