The evolution of word retrieval errors during semantic feature-based therapy in bilingual aphasia

Bilinguals with aphasia routinely experience anomia in one or both of their languages that may be ameliorated by language treatment. Traditionally, treatment response has been captured by binary scoring systems that measure the presence or absence of improvement without examining how word retrieval attempts may change over time as a function of treatment. This study analyzed word retrieval errors and subsequent treatment outcomes for a group of 48 Spanish-English bilinguals with aphasia to determine if longitudinal error patterns could capture language recovery. Results revealed naming improvement for trained words in the treated language and translations of trained words in the untreated language. Specific types of word errors at baseline were associated with overall improvement in both languages; furthermore, patterns of responses changed over time as a function of lexical-semantic treatment. These results demonstrate error analyses may characterize bilingual treatment outcomes and provide new evidence for mechanisms of impaired word retrieval.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bilingualism Language and Cognition
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728925100370
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The evolution of word retrieval errors during semantic feature-based therapy in bilingual aphasia

Manuel Jose Marte, Erin Carpenter, Michael Scimeca, Claudia Peñaloza et al.
1 citations
Bilingualism Language and Cognition
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
1.43
article

The evolution of word retrieval errors during semantic feature-based therapy in bilingual aphasia

Manuel Jose Marte, Erin Carpenter, Michael Scimeca, Claudia Peñaloza, Swathi Kiran, Marissa Russell-Meill
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Bilinguals with aphasia routinely experience anomia in one or both of their languages that may be ameliorated by language treatment. Traditionally, treatment response has been captured by binary scoring systems that measure the presence or absence of improvement without examining how word retrieval attempts may change over time as a function of treatment. This study analyzed word retrieval errors and subsequent treatment outcomes for a group of 48 Spanish-English bilinguals with aphasia to determine if longitudinal error patterns could capture language recovery. Results revealed naming improvement for trained words in the treated language and translations of trained words in the untreated language. Specific types of word errors at baseline were associated with overall improvement in both languages; furthermore, patterns of responses changed over time as a function of lexical-semantic treatment. These results demonstrate error analyses may characterize bilingual treatment outcomes and provide new evidence for mechanisms of impaired word retrieval.

Bilingualism Language and Cognition
Boston University (US), University of Massachusetts Boston (US), Institut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
European Commission, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.