Impact of the ICU No-Visitation Policy on Delirium in Long-Term Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study

Introduction This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the no-visitation policy and the presence or absence of remote visitation during the policy period on delirium in intensive care unit (ICU) patients requiring mechanical ventilation and to obtain implications for critical care nursing practice. This research is important for informing ICU family visitation policies, as delirium is associated with increased mortality and prolonged ICU stay, and understanding the impact of family presence on delirium prevention has significant clinical implications. Methods This single-center retrospective observational study included patients who received mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours between February 2019 and October 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on before and after the implementation of the no-visitation policy due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and the incidence and duration of delirium were compared. Delirium was assessed using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC), and logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the impact of the no-visitation policy on delirium occurrence. Results The study included 359 patients (pre-policy group: 183 patients, post-policy group: 176 patients). Patient demographics included a median age of 69 years (interquartile range: 56-78), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Disease Classification System II (APACHE II) score of 21 (range: 16-27), and mechanical ventilation duration of eight days (range: 5-17). The incidence of delirium was 72.7% (133/183) in the pre-policy group and 65.9% (116/176) in the no-visitation policy group (p=0.164). The duration of delirium was four (range: two to seven) days in both groups (p=0.593). There was also no significant difference in delirium incidence based on whether remote visitation was provided in the no-visitation policy period (p=0.81). Conclusions The no-visitation policy was not significantly associated with the incidence or duration of delirium in ICU patients requiring long-term mechanical ventilation. We are suggesting that comprehensive non-pharmacological interventions, rather than family visitation alone, may be essential for delirium prevention in high-risk ICU populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.89771
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of the ICU No-Visitation Policy on Delirium in Long-Term Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study

Kuniyasu Kamiya, Kazunori Makino, Yukie Akamatsu, Kohei Mitsui et al.
Cureus
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

Impact of the ICU No-Visitation Policy on Delirium in Long-Term Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study

Kuniyasu Kamiya, Kazunori Makino, Yukie Akamatsu, Kohei Mitsui, Tomoo Sato, Kenta Ogushi, Takakazu Kitatsuji, Yoshihiro Kageoka, Hiroto Hanamachi, Yoshiki Sowa
article en

Abstract

Introduction This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the no-visitation policy and the presence or absence of remote visitation during the policy period on delirium in intensive care unit (ICU) patients requiring mechanical ventilation and to obtain implications for critical care nursing practice. This research is important for informing ICU family visitation policies, as delirium is associated with increased mortality and prolonged ICU stay, and understanding the impact of family presence on delirium prevention has significant clinical implications. Methods This single-center retrospective observational study included patients who received mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours between February 2019 and October 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on before and after the implementation of the no-visitation policy due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and the incidence and duration of delirium were compared. Delirium was assessed using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC), and logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the impact of the no-visitation policy on delirium occurrence. Results The study included 359 patients (pre-policy group: 183 patients, post-policy group: 176 patients). Patient demographics included a median age of 69 years (interquartile range: 56-78), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Disease Classification System II (APACHE II) score of 21 (range: 16-27), and mechanical ventilation duration of eight days (range: 5-17). The incidence of delirium was 72.7% (133/183) in the pre-policy group and 65.9% (116/176) in the no-visitation policy group (p=0.164). The duration of delirium was four (range: two to seven) days in both groups (p=0.593). There was also no significant difference in delirium incidence based on whether remote visitation was provided in the no-visitation policy period (p=0.81). Conclusions The no-visitation policy was not significantly associated with the incidence or duration of delirium in ICU patients requiring long-term mechanical ventilation. We are suggesting that comprehensive non-pharmacological interventions, rather than family visitation alone, may be essential for delirium prevention in high-risk ICU populations.

CureusVol. 17(8)
Kobe City College of Nursing (JP), Kobe University Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.