Awareness and practice of using public generative AI solutions (such as ChatGPT) and social media among psychiatrists compared to other professionals: A pilot study

Background:The integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools in healthcare has prompted growing interest and concern, especially among mental health professionals.This pilot cross-sectional study explored the awareness, use, and ethical considerations of public generative AI solutions and social media among psychiatrists (n = 27) and professionals from other fields (n = 44).An anonymous online questionnaire was administered between May and July 2024, collecting both quantitative and qualitative data.Nonparametric tests (Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square, Fisher's exact) were used due to the non-normal distribution and small sample size. Results:Results revealed no significant difference in frequency of AI use between the groups.However, psychiatrists were more likely to report behavioral change based on AI-generated content (p = 0.025) and felt more prepared to discuss AI with patients (p = 0.011).Ethical concerns regarding AI-induced bias and discrimination were significantly more pronounced among psychiatrists (p = 0.049).Both groups emphasized the need for institutional support, though psychiatrists more frequently mentioned GDPR compliance and evidence-based resources.Conclusions: Despite limitations, including sample size and selection bias, this exploratory study highlights key differences in how professionals perceive and engage with generative AI.Findings support the need for targeted education and ethical guidelines in psychiatric practice regarding AI use.