A mirage search optimization algorithm that combines dual-chaos mapping and an opposition-based learning strategy

In this study, we propose a mirage search optimization algorithm that combines dual-chaos mapping and an opposition-based learning tactic, which we call the dual-chaos mapping opposition-based learning mirage search optimization (DMOMSO) algorithm. First, when initializing the population, a chaotic initialization method was used. This method takes advantage of the chaotic characteristics of iterative mapping to generate an initial population with high dispersion. Thus, the algorithm can more reliably reach the global optimum in a shorter time. Before the formal iteration process starts, a chaotic sequence is generated via chaotic mapping, which is used to update the iterative parameters, enabling them to vary dynamically throughout the iterative process. This helps the algorithm avoid becoming stuck in local optima, as well as enhancing its optimization performance and accelerating its convergence. In each iteration, the parameters are adjusted using the opposition-based learning method, which helps to cover the solution space more effectively, find good solutions faster, and explore a wider area. We conducted simulation experiments to assess the DMOMSO algorithm's effectiveness, in terms of its performance on the CEC2017 and CEC2022 benchmark function sets. In this way, we carried out a comparative analysis between the DMOMSO algorithm and seven other algorithms, namely, MSO, SSA, AO, FOX, WOA, HHO, and COA. The experimental results indicated that the DMOMSO algorithm outperforms the original mirage search optimization algorithm, being able to more effectively find optimal solutions and converging faster. The eight considered algorithms were also tested in the context of practical optimization problems, including the design of hydrostatic thrust bearings, the optimization of Himmel Blau's function, and industrial refrigeration system design. Based on the results obtained, DMOMSO is more effective for solving complex engineering problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronic Research Archive
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3934/era.2025208
Primary Topic
Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A mirage search optimization algorithm that combines dual-chaos mapping and an opposition-based learning strategy

Chaochuan Jia, Yu Liu, Yang Yang, Xiancun Zhou et al.
Electronic Research Archive
Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
article

A mirage search optimization algorithm that combines dual-chaos mapping and an opposition-based learning strategy

Chaochuan Jia, Yu Liu, Yang Yang, Xiancun Zhou, Maosheng Fu
article en

Abstract

In this study, we propose a mirage search optimization algorithm that combines dual-chaos mapping and an opposition-based learning tactic, which we call the dual-chaos mapping opposition-based learning mirage search optimization (DMOMSO) algorithm. First, when initializing the population, a chaotic initialization method was used. This method takes advantage of the chaotic characteristics of iterative mapping to generate an initial population with high dispersion. Thus, the algorithm can more reliably reach the global optimum in a shorter time. Before the formal iteration process starts, a chaotic sequence is generated via chaotic mapping, which is used to update the iterative parameters, enabling them to vary dynamically throughout the iterative process. This helps the algorithm avoid becoming stuck in local optima, as well as enhancing its optimization performance and accelerating its convergence. In each iteration, the parameters are adjusted using the opposition-based learning method, which helps to cover the solution space more effectively, find good solutions faster, and explore a wider area. We conducted simulation experiments to assess the DMOMSO algorithm's effectiveness, in terms of its performance on the CEC2017 and CEC2022 benchmark function sets. In this way, we carried out a comparative analysis between the DMOMSO algorithm and seven other algorithms, namely, MSO, SSA, AO, FOX, WOA, HHO, and COA. The experimental results indicated that the DMOMSO algorithm outperforms the original mirage search optimization algorithm, being able to more effectively find optimal solutions and converging faster. The eight considered algorithms were also tested in the context of practical optimization problems, including the design of hydrostatic thrust bearings, the optimization of Himmel Blau's function, and industrial refrigeration system design. Based on the results obtained, DMOMSO is more effective for solving complex engineering problems.

Electronic Research ArchiveVol. 33(8)
West Anhui University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.