No-tillage and intercropping improve the yield and profitability of maize-cotton rotations in Northern Benin

Abstract This study investigated the effect of conservation agriculture (CA) practices (e.g. no-tillage (NT) and maize-soybean (MS) intercrops) on the yield and profitability of maize and cotton within the first two years of a crop rotation system. A factorial design that compared two tillage practices (conventional tillage, CT and NT) and two cropping systems (sole maize, M and MS) was implemented on an experimental station in Northern Benin. All treatments were replicated thrice in 2022 and 2023. Soybean yield, maize grain yield and yield components, and seed-cotton yield and yield components were measured. Gross margin, labour productivity, and benefit:cost ratio were calculated, and a sensitivity analysis was done on the economic indicators under five scenarios (S0: gross margin calculation based on actual costs; S1: 30% higher fertiliser price; S2: 30% lower fertiliser price; S3 and S4, respectively: considering +/−1 standard deviation to the maize grain + soybean and seed-cotton yield). Tillage options and cropping systems significantly affected maize and cotton performance, but effects tended to vary between seasons. Treatment NT+MS produced the highest grain yield (4487 kg ha –1 ) and rain use efficiency (4.12 kg mm –1 ) in 2022, while CT+M produced the highest grain yield (3195 kg ha –1 ) and rain use efficiency (2.84 kg mm –1 ) in 2023. In the case of cotton, NT produced higher seed-cotton yield (1720 kg ha –1 ), boll number (7.38 bolls/plant), and rainfall use efficiency (1.56 kg mm –1 ) compared to CT in 2022. In 2023, cotton preceded by maize-soybean intercrops (NT+MS and CT+MS) produced significantly higher yield, aboveground and belowground biomass than cotton preceded by sole maize (NT+M and CT+M). For maize plus soybean, treatment NT+MS resulted in a significant increase in the gross margin, with an average of 582 US$ ha –1 with respect to CT+M under all scenarios in 2022, whereas CT+M and NT+MS attained a significantly higher maize/soybean gross margin in 2023. In the case of cotton, NT increased gross margin by 90-314% compared to CT across the sensitivity analysis scenarios in 2022. In 2023, cotton preceded by MS intercrops (NT+MS and CT+MS) showed a higher gross margin than preceded by sole crops (NT+M and CT+M) across all scenarios. To the well-documented effects of diversification on crop productivity, this study adds evidence on its positive impact on economic performance in a West African context. On-farm research and rural extension are necessary to further fine-tune these practices to fit the reality of smallholder cotton-based cropping systems of Benin.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Experimental Agriculture
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0014479725100136
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No-tillage and intercropping improve the yield and profitability of maize-cotton rotations in Northern Benin

Pierrot Lionel Yemadje, Emmanuel Sêkloka, Pablo Adrián Tittonell, Tobi Moriaque Akplo et al.
5 citations
Experimental Agriculture
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
9.51
article

No-tillage and intercropping improve the yield and profitability of maize-cotton rotations in Northern Benin

Pierrot Lionel Yemadje, Emmanuel Sêkloka, Pablo Adrián Tittonell, Tobi Moriaque Akplo, Lucien Imorou
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study investigated the effect of conservation agriculture (CA) practices (e.g. no-tillage (NT) and maize-soybean (MS) intercrops) on the yield and profitability of maize and cotton within the first two years of a crop rotation system. A factorial design that compared two tillage practices (conventional tillage, CT and NT) and two cropping systems (sole maize, M and MS) was implemented on an experimental station in Northern Benin. All treatments were replicated thrice in 2022 and 2023. Soybean yield, maize grain yield and yield components, and seed-cotton yield and yield components were measured. Gross margin, labour productivity, and benefit:cost ratio were calculated, and a sensitivity analysis was done on the economic indicators under five scenarios (S0: gross margin calculation based on actual costs; S1: 30% higher fertiliser price; S2: 30% lower fertiliser price; S3 and S4, respectively: considering +/−1 standard deviation to the maize grain + soybean and seed-cotton yield). Tillage options and cropping systems significantly affected maize and cotton performance, but effects tended to vary between seasons. Treatment NT+MS produced the highest grain yield (4487 kg ha –1 ) and rain use efficiency (4.12 kg mm –1 ) in 2022, while CT+M produced the highest grain yield (3195 kg ha –1 ) and rain use efficiency (2.84 kg mm –1 ) in 2023. In the case of cotton, NT produced higher seed-cotton yield (1720 kg ha –1 ), boll number (7.38 bolls/plant), and rainfall use efficiency (1.56 kg mm –1 ) compared to CT in 2022. In 2023, cotton preceded by maize-soybean intercrops (NT+MS and CT+MS) produced significantly higher yield, aboveground and belowground biomass than cotton preceded by sole maize (NT+M and CT+M). For maize plus soybean, treatment NT+MS resulted in a significant increase in the gross margin, with an average of 582 US$ ha –1 with respect to CT+M under all scenarios in 2022, whereas CT+M and NT+MS attained a significantly higher maize/soybean gross margin in 2023. In the case of cotton, NT increased gross margin by 90-314% compared to CT across the sensitivity analysis scenarios in 2022. In 2023, cotton preceded by MS intercrops (NT+MS and CT+MS) showed a higher gross margin than preceded by sole crops (NT+M and CT+M) across all scenarios. To the well-documented effects of diversification on crop productivity, this study adds evidence on its positive impact on economic performance in a West African context. On-farm research and rural extension are necessary to further fine-tune these practices to fit the reality of smallholder cotton-based cropping systems of Benin.

Experimental AgricultureVol. 61
University of Groningen (NL), Université de Montpellier (FR), Cotton Research Institute (CN), Université de Parakou (BJ), Université d'Abomey-Calavi (BJ), Agro-écologie et intensification durable des cultures annuelles, University of Puerto Rico at Carolina (PR)
Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Agence Française de Développement
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
9.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.