USAID Aid Freeze: A Double-Edged Result for Democratic Accountability in Liberia

Following USAID aid freeze, there have been many concerns about the implications, including the impact on democracy in Africa at such a time when Freedom House and other democracy indices are reporting that democracy is in decline in the continent. In Liberia, USAID allocated funding to support elections and broader democracy work, including a recent program on Strengthening Political Parties (SP3), a five-year (2017-2022) $6.8 million initiative that was meant to develop political parties’ ability to participate in and promote peaceful and credible elections. Also, USAID provided support for the Local Empowerment for Government Inclusion and Transparency (LEGIT) program which supported decentralizations reforms and helped to build the capacity of government officials to governance and accountability, the Liberia Accountability and Voice Initiative (LAVI) which focused on strengthening multi-stakeholder partnerships to advocate for and monitor policy and accountability reforms, and the President’s Young Professionals Program (PYPP) which aimed at developing the next generation of Liberia’s civil service leaders by recruiting and training young and outstanding Liberian college graduates. Obviously, the drawback for Liberia is that all these programs which helped to build citizen’s awareness of good governance and their rights to demand accountability from their leaders, could be scaled down significantly, and some may even cease to exist. However, the positive outcome for Liberia is that it presents an opportunity to make reforms and strengthen domestic accountability. Liberian officials, instead of accounting to the US Government, have an opportunity to look inward, strengthen dialogue with their citizens and improve accountable governance. This involves keeping the citizens well informed of decisions on such things as the national budget, spending priorities of the government, and loan obligations, among others. This, in my mind, would help to create better governance and development outcomes for Liberia.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.907000238
Primary Topic
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

USAID Aid Freeze: A Double-Edged Result for Democratic Accountability in Liberia

G. Mackie Cole
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
article

USAID Aid Freeze: A Double-Edged Result for Democratic Accountability in Liberia

G. Mackie Cole
article en

Abstract

Following USAID aid freeze, there have been many concerns about the implications, including the impact on democracy in Africa at such a time when Freedom House and other democracy indices are reporting that democracy is in decline in the continent. In Liberia, USAID allocated funding to support elections and broader democracy work, including a recent program on Strengthening Political Parties (SP3), a five-year (2017-2022) $6.8 million initiative that was meant to develop political parties’ ability to participate in and promote peaceful and credible elections. Also, USAID provided support for the Local Empowerment for Government Inclusion and Transparency (LEGIT) program which supported decentralizations reforms and helped to build the capacity of government officials to governance and accountability, the Liberia Accountability and Voice Initiative (LAVI) which focused on strengthening multi-stakeholder partnerships to advocate for and monitor policy and accountability reforms, and the President’s Young Professionals Program (PYPP) which aimed at developing the next generation of Liberia’s civil service leaders by recruiting and training young and outstanding Liberian college graduates. Obviously, the drawback for Liberia is that all these programs which helped to build citizen’s awareness of good governance and their rights to demand accountability from their leaders, could be scaled down significantly, and some may even cease to exist. However, the positive outcome for Liberia is that it presents an opportunity to make reforms and strengthen domestic accountability. Liberian officials, instead of accounting to the US Government, have an opportunity to look inward, strengthen dialogue with their citizens and improve accountable governance. This involves keeping the citizens well informed of decisions on such things as the national budget, spending priorities of the government, and loan obligations, among others. This, in my mind, would help to create better governance and development outcomes for Liberia.

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social ScienceVol. IX(VII)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

USAID Aid Freeze: A Double-Edged Result for Democratic Accountability in Liberia — G. Mackie Cole · International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS