Research on stability and decay properties of superheavy nuclei based on neural network method

<sec>This study aims to develop a highly accurate method of predicting α-decay energy (<i>Q</i><sub>α</sub>) of superheavy nuclei (SHN) and to identify the region of enhanced stability (the “island of stability”) based on α-decay properties. Improving the accuracy of <i>Q</i><sub>α</sub> calculations is crucial for reliably predicting α-decay half-lives, which are essential for identifying newly synthesized superheavy elements.</sec><sec>A modified liquid-drop model (LDM) formula for calculating <i>Q</i><sub>α</sub> is proposed, eliminating explicit dependence on magic numbers to improve universality. However, the initial LDM formula alone yields a high root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of 663.5 keV compared with experimental <i>Q</i><sub>α</sub> values from the AME2016 database for 369 nuclei with <i>Z</i> ≥ 82. In order to significantly improve accuracy, a neural network (NN) method is combined with the LDM formula. For a feedforward backpropagation (BP) neural network with a 2-21-1 architecture (2 input neurons: proton number <i>Z</i> and mass number <i>A</i>; 21 hidden neurons; 1 output neuron), the correction term <inline-formula><tex-math id="M8">\begin{document}$ \text{δ}{{Q}}_{\text{α}} $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> is developed. The network is trained using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm on a dataset of 369 nuclei (319 training, 50 validation). The final <i>Q</i><sub>α</sub> prediction is given by <inline-formula><tex-math id="M9">\begin{document}$ Q_{\text{α}} ^{{\text{NN}}} = Q_{\text{α}} ^{{\text{Eq}}{\text{. (2)}}} + \delta Q_{\text{α}} ^{} $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>. The unified decay law (UDL) formula is then used to calculate α-decay half-lives (<i>T</i><sub>1/2</sub>), with and without NN correction (denoted as UDL and UDL<sup>NN</sup>). The main results obtained are listed below.</sec><sec>1) Improved <i>Q</i><sub>α</sub> accuracy: The NN correction dramatically reduces the RMSD between calculated and experimental <i>Q</i><sub>α</sub> values from 663.5 keV (LDM alone) to 89.2 keV.</sec><sec>2) Capturing shell effects: Remarkably, although there is no explicit input of nuclear shell information, the NN-corrected <i>Q</i><sub>α</sub> predictions clearly reproduce known shell structures, including the expected shell closure near <i>N</i> = 184 for superheavy nuclei. This is evident in the systematic lowering of predicted <i>Q</i><sub>α</sub> values (implying increased stability) around the predicted doubly magic nucleus <sup>298</sup>Fl (<i>Z</i> = 114, <i>N</i> = 184) and other known shell closures (e.g., <i>N</i> = 152, <i>N</i> = 162).</sec><sec>3) Half-life predictions: Using the NN-corrected <i>Q</i><sub>α</sub> in the UDL formula (UDL<sup>NN</sup>) further refines <i>T</i><sub>1/2</sub> predictions, reducing the RMSD from 0.631 (UDL alone) to 0.423. The method reliably reproduces experimental half-lives and shell-related features, such as a significant increase in <i>T</i><sub>1/2</sub> near shell closure (e.g. <i>N</i> = 126) and odd-A/odd-odd nuclei due to blocking effects.</sec><sec>4) Validation: Predictions for recently synthesized neutron-deficient uranium isotopes <sup>214,216,218</sup>U agree well with new experimental data of <i>Q</i><sub>α</sub> and <i>T</i><sub>1/2</sub>. Predictions for Fl isotopic chains also show good agreement with experimental trends.</sec><sec>5) Stability island prediction: Maps of predicted <i>Q</i><sub>α</sub> and <i>T</i><sub>1/2</sub> in the superheavy region consistently identify minimum value (indicating maximum stability) near the theoretically predicted doube magic nucleus <sup>298</sup>Fl. A potential secondary stability center near <i>Z</i> = 126 and <i>N</i> = 228 is suggested, but further verification is needed. The longest predicted region of <i>T</i><sub>1/2</sub> coincides with the <i>N</i> = 184 shell closure.</sec><sec>The conclusions drawn from the above findings are as follows. Integrating a neural network with a modified liquid-drop model formula provides a powerful and accurate method for predicting α-decay energies (<i>Q</i><sub>α</sub>) of heavy and superheavy nuclei. The NN successfully learns and corrects complex shell effects implicitly, significantly improving prediction accuracy (RMSD reduced by ~85%). By combining the UDL formula, this method yields reliable α-decay half-lives. The results strongly confirm the existence and location of the predicted “island of stability” centered on the double magic nucleus <sup>298</sup>Fl, providing valuable theoretical guidance for future experiments on the synthesis and identification of superheavy elements.</sec>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Physica Sinica
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.74.20250720
Primary Topic
Nuclear physics research studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on stability and decay properties of superheavy nuclei based on neural network method

Tianliang Zhao, Xiaojun Bao, Wenhao Huang, Haijun Chen et al.
1 links
Acta Physica Sinica
Nuclear physics research studies
article

Research on stability and decay properties of superheavy nuclei based on neural network method

Tianliang Zhao, Xiaojun Bao, Wenhao Huang, Haijun Chen, Sheng Haowen, Wu Binqi
article en

Abstract

<sec>This study aims to develop a highly accurate method of predicting α-decay energy (<i>Q</i><sub>α</sub>) of superheavy nuclei (SHN) and to identify the region of enhanced stability (the “island of stability”) based on α-decay properties. Improving the accuracy of <i>Q</i><sub>α</sub> calculations is crucial for reliably predicting α-decay half-lives, which are essential for identifying newly synthesized superheavy elements.</sec><sec>A modified liquid-drop model (LDM) formula for calculating <i>Q</i><sub>α</sub> is proposed, eliminating explicit dependence on magic numbers to improve universality. However, the initial LDM formula alone yields a high root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of 663.5 keV compared with experimental <i>Q</i><sub>α</sub> values from the AME2016 database for 369 nuclei with <i>Z</i> ≥ 82. In order to significantly improve accuracy, a neural network (NN) method is combined with the LDM formula. For a feedforward backpropagation (BP) neural network with a 2-21-1 architecture (2 input neurons: proton number <i>Z</i> and mass number <i>A</i>; 21 hidden neurons; 1 output neuron), the correction term <inline-formula><tex-math id="M8">\begin{document}$ \text{δ}{{Q}}_{\text{α}} $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> is developed. The network is trained using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm on a dataset of 369 nuclei (319 training, 50 validation). The final <i>Q</i><sub>α</sub> prediction is given by <inline-formula><tex-math id="M9">\begin{document}$ Q_{\text{α}} ^{{\text{NN}}} = Q_{\text{α}} ^{{\text{Eq}}{\text{. (2)}}} + \delta Q_{\text{α}} ^{} $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>. The unified decay law (UDL) formula is then used to calculate α-decay half-lives (<i>T</i><sub>1/2</sub>), with and without NN correction (denoted as UDL and UDL<sup>NN</sup>). The main results obtained are listed below.</sec><sec>1) Improved <i>Q</i><sub>α</sub> accuracy: The NN correction dramatically reduces the RMSD between calculated and experimental <i>Q</i><sub>α</sub> values from 663.5 keV (LDM alone) to 89.2 keV.</sec><sec>2) Capturing shell effects: Remarkably, although there is no explicit input of nuclear shell information, the NN-corrected <i>Q</i><sub>α</sub> predictions clearly reproduce known shell structures, including the expected shell closure near <i>N</i> = 184 for superheavy nuclei. This is evident in the systematic lowering of predicted <i>Q</i><sub>α</sub> values (implying increased stability) around the predicted doubly magic nucleus <sup>298</sup>Fl (<i>Z</i> = 114, <i>N</i> = 184) and other known shell closures (e.g., <i>N</i> = 152, <i>N</i> = 162).</sec><sec>3) Half-life predictions: Using the NN-corrected <i>Q</i><sub>α</sub> in the UDL formula (UDL<sup>NN</sup>) further refines <i>T</i><sub>1/2</sub> predictions, reducing the RMSD from 0.631 (UDL alone) to 0.423. The method reliably reproduces experimental half-lives and shell-related features, such as a significant increase in <i>T</i><sub>1/2</sub> near shell closure (e.g. <i>N</i> = 126) and odd-A/odd-odd nuclei due to blocking effects.</sec><sec>4) Validation: Predictions for recently synthesized neutron-deficient uranium isotopes <sup>214,216,218</sup>U agree well with new experimental data of <i>Q</i><sub>α</sub> and <i>T</i><sub>1/2</sub>. Predictions for Fl isotopic chains also show good agreement with experimental trends.</sec><sec>5) Stability island prediction: Maps of predicted <i>Q</i><sub>α</sub> and <i>T</i><sub>1/2</sub> in the superheavy region consistently identify minimum value (indicating maximum stability) near the theoretically predicted doube magic nucleus <sup>298</sup>Fl. A potential secondary stability center near <i>Z</i> = 126 and <i>N</i> = 228 is suggested, but further verification is needed. The longest predicted region of <i>T</i><sub>1/2</sub> coincides with the <i>N</i> = 184 shell closure.</sec><sec>The conclusions drawn from the above findings are as follows. Integrating a neural network with a modified liquid-drop model formula provides a powerful and accurate method for predicting α-decay energies (<i>Q</i><sub>α</sub>) of heavy and superheavy nuclei. The NN successfully learns and corrects complex shell effects implicitly, significantly improving prediction accuracy (RMSD reduced by ~85%). By combining the UDL formula, this method yields reliable α-decay half-lives. The results strongly confirm the existence and location of the predicted “island of stability” centered on the double magic nucleus <sup>298</sup>Fl, providing valuable theoretical guidance for future experiments on the synthesis and identification of superheavy elements.</sec>

Acta Physica SinicaVol. 74(19)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Nuclear physics research studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.