Bioethics Meets Political Philosophy

This special issue of Diametros critically examines the evolving relationship between bioethics and political philosophy, focusing on the limitations of autonomy-centric and neutrality-based liberalism in addressing contemporary bioethical challenges. Through four contributions, by Greg Bognar, Søren Holm, Jurga Jonutytė, and Thaddeus Metz, the issue explores the normative tensions surrounding genetic enhancement, the exclusionary use of public reason in bioethics, the ontological dimensions of identity under institutional humiliation, and the moral justification of healthcare allocation. Drawing on real-world examples such as vaccine hesitancy, conscientious objection in healthcare, disability activism, and treatment prioritization, the authors argue for a rethinking of liberal frameworks in light of biopolitical complexity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diametros
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.2070
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bioethics Meets Political Philosophy

Tomasz Żuradzki, Elena Popa
Diametros
Ethics in medical practice
article

Bioethics Meets Political Philosophy

Tomasz Żuradzki, Elena Popa
article en

Abstract

This special issue of Diametros critically examines the evolving relationship between bioethics and political philosophy, focusing on the limitations of autonomy-centric and neutrality-based liberalism in addressing contemporary bioethical challenges. Through four contributions, by Greg Bognar, Søren Holm, Jurga Jonutytė, and Thaddeus Metz, the issue explores the normative tensions surrounding genetic enhancement, the exclusionary use of public reason in bioethics, the ontological dimensions of identity under institutional humiliation, and the moral justification of healthcare allocation. Drawing on real-world examples such as vaccine hesitancy, conscientious objection in healthcare, disability activism, and treatment prioritization, the authors argue for a rethinking of liberal frameworks in light of biopolitical complexity.

DiametrosVol. 22(84)
Jagiellonian University (PL), Institute of Philosophy (RU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Ethics in medical practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.