Dynamics of the Novel Cardiac Biomarkers sST2, H-FABP, GDF-15 and suPAR in HFrEF Patients Undergoing Heart Failure Therapy, a Pilot Study

<b>Background:</b> Despite improvements in medical therapy, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a major burden on the healthcare system and remains a leading cause of death with a 5-year mortality rate of more than 60%. Novel therapeutic agents such as angiotensin-receptor-neprilysin-inhibitors (ARNIs) lead to significant improvement in clinical outcomes. Optimal therapy monitoring under these novel drugs is crucial for improving the outcome. In this trial, the diagnostic potential of four novel cardiovascular biomarkers-GDF-15, sST2, H-FABP, and suPAR-was evaluated during follow-up in patients with HFrEF. <b>Methods:</b> In this prospective cohort pilot study, 70 patients with HFrEF with ischemic (n = 34) and non-ischemic (n = 36) origin were included. All included patients were on a stable treatment regimen and in a non-decompensated state. The clinical parameters NYHA class, LVEF, MPI/Tei index and ESC Score 2 and the laboratory parameters sST2 (remodeling, inflammation), GDF-15 (remodeling, inflammation), H-FABP (subclinical ischemia and ischemia), suPAR (remodeling, inflammation) and NT-proBNP were assessed before ARNI therapy initiation and at 3 to 6 months at follow-up. Before starting ARNI therapy with sacubitril/valsartan patients had stable and well-established heart failure therapy. <b>Results:</b> There was a sufficient response to therapy with significant improvement in ejection fraction from 29.9% to 38.5% (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and a significant decrease in NT-proBNP from 1402 pg/mL to 572.0 pg/mL (<i>p</i> = 0.003). Interestingly, along with that, a significant increase in sST2 levels from 9602 pg/mL to 12,001 pg/mL (<i>p</i> = 0.039) but no significant change in H-FABP (<i>p</i> = 0.397), GDF-15 (<i>p</i> = 0.382) or suPAR (<i>p</i> = 0.328) were observed. Furthermore, the baseline sST2 level correlated with the risk of cardiovascular events calculated with the ESC Score 2 and the GDF15 level at follow-up correlated with the right ventricular global function, assessed with the MPI/Tei index and this correlation persisted after correction for confounders (<i>r</i> = 0.323, <i>p</i> = 0.039; <i>r</i> = 0.504, <i>p</i> = 0.011). <b>Conclusions:</b> The novel biomarker sST2 but not H-FABP, GDF-15 and suPAR was significantly affected by medical therapy with ARNIs. Monitoring sST2 might offer new opportunities for therapy guidance and disease management. However, these results are hypothesis generating and should be interpreted with caution, given the pilot nature of this study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14165668
Citations
4
Primary Topic
GDF15 and Related Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamics of the Novel Cardiac Biomarkers sST2, H-FABP, GDF-15 and suPAR in HFrEF Patients Undergoing Heart Failure Therapy, a Pilot Study

Liudmyla Pylypenko, Vera Paar, Peter Jirak, Rudin Pistulli et al.
4 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
GDF15 and Related Biomarkers
6.67
article

Dynamics of the Novel Cardiac Biomarkers sST2, H-FABP, GDF-15 and suPAR in HFrEF Patients Undergoing Heart Failure Therapy, a Pilot Study

Liudmyla Pylypenko, Vera Paar, Peter Jirak, Rudin Pistulli, Н. Ш. Загидуллин, Lukas J. Motloch, Uta C. Hoppe, Zornitsa Shomanova, Bernhard Ohnewein, Albert Topf, Michael Lichtenauer, Max Schäbinger, Fabian Volg
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Despite improvements in medical therapy, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a major burden on the healthcare system and remains a leading cause of death with a 5-year mortality rate of more than 60%. Novel therapeutic agents such as angiotensin-receptor-neprilysin-inhibitors (ARNIs) lead to significant improvement in clinical outcomes. Optimal therapy monitoring under these novel drugs is crucial for improving the outcome. In this trial, the diagnostic potential of four novel cardiovascular biomarkers-GDF-15, sST2, H-FABP, and suPAR-was evaluated during follow-up in patients with HFrEF. <b>Methods:</b> In this prospective cohort pilot study, 70 patients with HFrEF with ischemic (n = 34) and non-ischemic (n = 36) origin were included. All included patients were on a stable treatment regimen and in a non-decompensated state. The clinical parameters NYHA class, LVEF, MPI/Tei index and ESC Score 2 and the laboratory parameters sST2 (remodeling, inflammation), GDF-15 (remodeling, inflammation), H-FABP (subclinical ischemia and ischemia), suPAR (remodeling, inflammation) and NT-proBNP were assessed before ARNI therapy initiation and at 3 to 6 months at follow-up. Before starting ARNI therapy with sacubitril/valsartan patients had stable and well-established heart failure therapy. <b>Results:</b> There was a sufficient response to therapy with significant improvement in ejection fraction from 29.9% to 38.5% (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and a significant decrease in NT-proBNP from 1402 pg/mL to 572.0 pg/mL (<i>p</i> = 0.003). Interestingly, along with that, a significant increase in sST2 levels from 9602 pg/mL to 12,001 pg/mL (<i>p</i> = 0.039) but no significant change in H-FABP (<i>p</i> = 0.397), GDF-15 (<i>p</i> = 0.382) or suPAR (<i>p</i> = 0.328) were observed. Furthermore, the baseline sST2 level correlated with the risk of cardiovascular events calculated with the ESC Score 2 and the GDF15 level at follow-up correlated with the right ventricular global function, assessed with the MPI/Tei index and this correlation persisted after correction for confounders (<i>r</i> = 0.323, <i>p</i> = 0.039; <i>r</i> = 0.504, <i>p</i> = 0.011). <b>Conclusions:</b> The novel biomarker sST2 but not H-FABP, GDF-15 and suPAR was significantly affected by medical therapy with ARNIs. Monitoring sST2 might offer new opportunities for therapy guidance and disease management. However, these results are hypothesis generating and should be interpreted with caution, given the pilot nature of this study.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(16)
Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT), Minnesota State University Moorhead (US), Paracelsus Medical University (AT), University Hospital Münster (DE), Kepler Universitätsklinikum (AT), Bashkir State Medical University (RU), Otto Wagner Hospital (AT), Salzburger Landeskliniken (AT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
GDF15 and Related Biomarkers
6.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.