Challenges, motivations, and perspectives of practitioners on forest restoration across seven European countries

Forest restoration is crucial in addressing nature degradation, enhancing climate adaptation and mitigation, supporting ecosystem services, and reducing disaster risk. Understanding practitioners' perspectives is essential for identifying barriers to successful restoration and improving the effectiveness of future initiatives. This study employs a mixed‐methods approach, integrating qualitative data from seven practitioner workshops and quantitative data from an online survey conducted across seven European countries (Austria, Bulgaria, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Poland, and Serbia). The survey included 110 respondents, while 203 practitioners participated in workshops. Their primary motivations for engaging in restoration included a desire for ecosystem stability and nature preservation, followed by knowledge acquisition, responsibility for environmental stewardship, and climate change mitigation. Despite these challenges, practitioners highlighted advances in monitoring technologies, the diversification of project objectives, and increased public engagement as positive developments. The study concludes that a collaborative approach—enhancing the involvement of practitioners in policymaking—is critical for future restoration success. Additionally, growing public interest in ecological restoration presents an opportunity for alternative funding sources, which could address financial constraints and strengthen restoration efforts across Europe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70160
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges, motivations, and perspectives of practitioners on forest restoration across seven European countries

Martina Zorić, María Menéndez‐Miguélez, Leland K. Werden, Maitane Erdozain et al.
1 citations
Restoration Ecology
Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
1.67
article

Challenges, motivations, and perspectives of practitioners on forest restoration across seven European countries

Martina Zorić, María Menéndez‐Miguélez, Leland K. Werden, Maitane Erdozain, Ferenc Lakatos, Katharina Lapin, Sergio de‐Miguel, Isabel Cañellas, Marcin Krzysztof Dyderski, Johan Svensson, Icíar Alberdi, Jenni R. Roche, J. Hoffmann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Forest restoration is crucial in addressing nature degradation, enhancing climate adaptation and mitigation, supporting ecosystem services, and reducing disaster risk. Understanding practitioners' perspectives is essential for identifying barriers to successful restoration and improving the effectiveness of future initiatives. This study employs a mixed‐methods approach, integrating qualitative data from seven practitioner workshops and quantitative data from an online survey conducted across seven European countries (Austria, Bulgaria, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Poland, and Serbia). The survey included 110 respondents, while 203 practitioners participated in workshops. Their primary motivations for engaging in restoration included a desire for ecosystem stability and nature preservation, followed by knowledge acquisition, responsibility for environmental stewardship, and climate change mitigation. Despite these challenges, practitioners highlighted advances in monitoring technologies, the diversification of project objectives, and increased public engagement as positive developments. The study concludes that a collaborative approach—enhancing the involvement of practitioners in policymaking—is critical for future restoration success. Additionally, growing public interest in ecological restoration presents an opportunity for alternative funding sources, which could address financial constraints and strengthen restoration efforts across Europe.

Restoration EcologyVol. 33(8)
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), Universitat de Lleida (ES), University of Novi Sad (RS), Parks and Wildlife Service (AU), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), ETH Zurich (CH), Institute of Dendrology (PL), Forest Science and Technology Centre of Catalonia (ES), SystemsX.ch (CH), Austrian Research Centre for Forests (AT), Instituto de Ciencias Forestales, University of Sopron (HU), Center for International Forestry Research (ID), Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
Generalitat de Catalunya
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.