ESAFORM benchmark 2024: study on the geometric accuracy of a complex shape with single point incremental forming

The benchmark 2024 project on Incremental Sheet Forming (ISF), involving 15 research institutes in 13 experimental contributions, provided a unique opportunity to compare experimental outputs from various setups and forming strategies in ISF. This collaboration led to the development of uniform data exchange formats, measurement guidelines, and standardized nomenclature, fostering efficient future collaborations. The project addressed challenges in geometric accuracy when forming a relatively large part (400 × 400 mm) using Single Point Incremental Forming (SPIF) and focused on multiple common pitfalls in ISF, in particular the tent effect and pillow effect. Additionally, some experiments have been conducted using Two Point and Double Sided Incremental Forming (TPIF and DSIF). By combining the knowledge and experience of all participating institutes, this project aimed to provide insights into effective parameter choice and toolpath strategies, and shows the importance of multi-stage processes to increase the geometric accuracy. Despite the theoretical simplicity of SPIF setups, such multi-stage toolpath strategies directed toward improved geometric accuracy also add some new challenges. The study highlighted the need for multi-stage strategies that focus on local effects, as well as geometric compensation techniques to enhance ISF's industrial applicability. Alternative process variants like TPIF and DSIF, showed promising results, but they also had limitations and presented challenges, emphasizing the importance of predictive simulation tools to further increase geometric accuracy. The scalability of ISF experiments remains a significant challenge, necessitating further research into scale laws for process optimization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Material Forming
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-025-01928-1
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ESAFORM benchmark 2024: study on the geometric accuracy of a complex shape with single point incremental forming

Yanle Li, Giuseppina Ambrogio, Putong Kang, Radu-Eugen Breaz et al.
4 citations
International Journal of Material Forming
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
2.85
article

ESAFORM benchmark 2024: study on the geometric accuracy of a complex shape with single point incremental forming

Yanle Li, Giuseppina Ambrogio, Putong Kang, Radu-Eugen Breaz, Andreas Kunke, Thomas Bremen, H. Long, Gianluca Buffa, Łukasz Kuczek, M.B. Silva, Romina Conte, André Leonhardt, Peter Scholz, David Bailly, Konrad Perzyński, Hui Zhu, Youngrok Lee, Hans Vanhove, Livan Fratini, Sever‐Gabriel Racz, Francesco Gagliardi, Łukasz Madej, Roberto Licari, A. Senthil Kumar, Krzysztof Żaba, Luigi De Napoli, Dieter Weise, Mihaela Banu, Zhenwei Li, M. Vanhulst, Darren Wei Wen Low, Dennis Steinfels, Xiao Da Terrence Fu, Joost R. Duflou, Shaoqi Song, Margarida F. Gralha
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The benchmark 2024 project on Incremental Sheet Forming (ISF), involving 15 research institutes in 13 experimental contributions, provided a unique opportunity to compare experimental outputs from various setups and forming strategies in ISF. This collaboration led to the development of uniform data exchange formats, measurement guidelines, and standardized nomenclature, fostering efficient future collaborations. The project addressed challenges in geometric accuracy when forming a relatively large part (400 × 400 mm) using Single Point Incremental Forming (SPIF) and focused on multiple common pitfalls in ISF, in particular the tent effect and pillow effect. Additionally, some experiments have been conducted using Two Point and Double Sided Incremental Forming (TPIF and DSIF). By combining the knowledge and experience of all participating institutes, this project aimed to provide insights into effective parameter choice and toolpath strategies, and shows the importance of multi-stage processes to increase the geometric accuracy. Despite the theoretical simplicity of SPIF setups, such multi-stage toolpath strategies directed toward improved geometric accuracy also add some new challenges. The study highlighted the need for multi-stage strategies that focus on local effects, as well as geometric compensation techniques to enhance ISF's industrial applicability. Alternative process variants like TPIF and DSIF, showed promising results, but they also had limitations and presented challenges, emphasizing the importance of predictive simulation tools to further increase geometric accuracy. The scalability of ISF experiments remains a significant challenge, necessitating further research into scale laws for process optimization.

International Journal of Material FormingVol. 18(3)
Northwestern University (US), Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores Investigação e Desenvolvimento (PT), Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu (RO), University of Lisbon (PT), Shandong University (CN), National University of Singapore (SG), Chemnitz University of Technology (DE), University of Michigan (US), Flanders Make (Belgium) (BE), Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology (DE), University of Calabria (IT), AGH University of Krakow (PL), RWTH Aachen University (DE), University of Palermo (IT), University of Sheffield (GB)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
2.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.