Growth and Yield Response of Coppiced Robusta Coffee to Application of Different Combinations of Nitrogen and Potassium

Rejuvenation of coffee plants often requires coppicing of the trees, exposing the soil to forces of erosion and leaving the farmer without income for up to 2 years. This juvenile period is prolonged when the soil is depleted of nutrients such as nitrogen. A trial was therefore conducted on a coppiced Robusta coffee farm to evaluate the benefits of applying combinations of potassium and nitrogen to the soil during the rejuvenation period. The treatments evaluated were T1 (no fertilizer), T2 (200 kg N + 200 kg K), T3 (200 kg N + 300 kg N), T4 (200 kg N + 400 kg K), T5 (300 kg N + 200 kg K), T6 (300 kg N + 300 kg K), T7 (300 kg N + 400 kg K), T8 (400 kg N + 200 kg K), T9 (400 kg N + 300 kg K), and T10 (400 kg N + 400 kg K). These treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Data collected included weed growth and composition, growth of the coffee plants, and berry production. The data were subjected to analysis of variance, and differences between treatment means were determined by the least significant differences at 5% probability. Results showed that the application of higher rates of N and K led to faster weed growth and accumulation of more weed dry matter. Higher rates (T9 & T10) led to the accumulation of higher levels of chlorophyll in coffee leaves. Application of T9 promoted stem diameter and height increase in the rejuvenated Robusta coffee, while a higher number of laterals were supported by the application of T7. The application of T4 and T9 promoted higher early yield in Robusta coffee. Cumulatively, except for T6, all the fertilizer treatments supported the production of higher clean coffee beans compared to the control and hence higher gross income from the sale coffee beans. Application of the T4 and T9 combinations supported higher cumulative increase in clean coffee yield, while application of T6 reduced the cumulative clean coffee yield relative to the control. It was, therefore, concluded that combinations of N and K should be applied to coffee plants during rejuvenation, with the 400 kg N + 300 kg K·ha −1 recommended for supporting faster regrowth, higher berry production, and gross income.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Agronomy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/ioa/6278184
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Coffee research and impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Growth and Yield Response of Coppiced Robusta Coffee to Application of Different Combinations of Nitrogen and Potassium

Amos Kojo Quaye, Jerome Agbesi Dogbatse, Moses Kwame Aidoo, Patricia Adu‐Yeboah et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Agronomy
Coffee research and impacts
1.39
article

Growth and Yield Response of Coppiced Robusta Coffee to Application of Different Combinations of Nitrogen and Potassium

Amos Kojo Quaye, Jerome Agbesi Dogbatse, Moses Kwame Aidoo, Patricia Adu‐Yeboah, S. Konlan, Prince Pobee, Diana Donkor Ntiamoah, Elliot Kwaku Anyidoho, Maame Adjoa Segbefia
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Rejuvenation of coffee plants often requires coppicing of the trees, exposing the soil to forces of erosion and leaving the farmer without income for up to 2 years. This juvenile period is prolonged when the soil is depleted of nutrients such as nitrogen. A trial was therefore conducted on a coppiced Robusta coffee farm to evaluate the benefits of applying combinations of potassium and nitrogen to the soil during the rejuvenation period. The treatments evaluated were T1 (no fertilizer), T2 (200 kg N + 200 kg K), T3 (200 kg N + 300 kg N), T4 (200 kg N + 400 kg K), T5 (300 kg N + 200 kg K), T6 (300 kg N + 300 kg K), T7 (300 kg N + 400 kg K), T8 (400 kg N + 200 kg K), T9 (400 kg N + 300 kg K), and T10 (400 kg N + 400 kg K). These treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Data collected included weed growth and composition, growth of the coffee plants, and berry production. The data were subjected to analysis of variance, and differences between treatment means were determined by the least significant differences at 5% probability. Results showed that the application of higher rates of N and K led to faster weed growth and accumulation of more weed dry matter. Higher rates (T9 & T10) led to the accumulation of higher levels of chlorophyll in coffee leaves. Application of T9 promoted stem diameter and height increase in the rejuvenated Robusta coffee, while a higher number of laterals were supported by the application of T7. The application of T4 and T9 promoted higher early yield in Robusta coffee. Cumulatively, except for T6, all the fertilizer treatments supported the production of higher clean coffee beans compared to the control and hence higher gross income from the sale coffee beans. Application of the T4 and T9 combinations supported higher cumulative increase in clean coffee yield, while application of T6 reduced the cumulative clean coffee yield relative to the control. It was, therefore, concluded that combinations of N and K should be applied to coffee plants during rejuvenation, with the 400 kg N + 300 kg K·ha −1 recommended for supporting faster regrowth, higher berry production, and gross income.

International Journal of AgronomyVol. 2025(1)
Busoga University (UG), Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana (GH)
Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Coffee research and impacts
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.