Who influences risk management standardisation processes? The example of risk management standards

The use of standards has permeated virtually all aspects of modern society. Standards should be seen as the combined result of the standardisers’ expertise and the effects of the dynamics of the standardisation process itself. This article explores why some participants are more influential in standards development than others. Using an insider perspective, observations are gathered from almost a hundred activities and three hundred hours spent with international and national standardisation workgroups related to risk management. Discussing power relations, this study exposes the high influence of individuals in standardisation. By knowing and using the rules of the game, individual participants may significantly impact the process and the output. The empirical examples also show that people with high proficiency in English interact more in international standardisation activities than participants with a lower command of English. The challenges of inadequate participation, particularly from the risk science community, and unbalanced representation in standardisation activities are also discussed in the article.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Standardisation
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59490/jos.2025.7827
Primary Topic
Regulation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who influences risk management standardisation processes? The example of risk management standards

Johan Ingvarson
Journal of Standardisation
Regulation and Compliance Studies
article

Who influences risk management standardisation processes? The example of risk management standards

Johan Ingvarson
article en

Abstract

The use of standards has permeated virtually all aspects of modern society. Standards should be seen as the combined result of the standardisers’ expertise and the effects of the dynamics of the standardisation process itself. This article explores why some participants are more influential in standards development than others. Using an insider perspective, observations are gathered from almost a hundred activities and three hundred hours spent with international and national standardisation workgroups related to risk management. Discussing power relations, this study exposes the high influence of individuals in standardisation. By knowing and using the rules of the game, individual participants may significantly impact the process and the output. The empirical examples also show that people with high proficiency in English interact more in international standardisation activities than participants with a lower command of English. The challenges of inadequate participation, particularly from the risk science community, and unbalanced representation in standardisation activities are also discussed in the article.

Journal of StandardisationVol. 4
Lund University (SE)
Trafikverket
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Regulation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.