Investigating the influence of rank-and-file employees’ equity incentives on audit pricing: evidence from stock options

Purpose This study aims to investigate whether equity incentives granted to rank-and-file employees influence audit pricing in US firms. While prior research has primarily focused on executive compensation, this study explores how broad-based stock options compensation impacts auditors’ risk assessments and engagement outcomes, particularly through the lens of agency theory and behavioral risk theory. Design/methodology/approach Using a sample of 19,588 firm-year observations from 2004 to 2020, the study uses multivariate regression models, path analysis, entropy balancing and two-stage least squares to examine the relationship between rank-and-file employees’ stock options and audit outcomes. Findings This study documents a significant positive association between rank-and-file employees’ stock options and audit fees, suggesting that auditors view these incentives as indicators of elevated audit risk. This association is more pronounced among smaller firms, where governance and oversight mechanisms tend to be weaker. A path analysis shows that the relationship is mediated by a higher likelihood of material internal control weaknesses. Additionally, this study finds that rank-and-file equity incentives are associated with longer audit report lags, consistent with increased audit effort by auditors. Practical implications The findings of this study suggest that audit standards should be broadened to include the evaluation of compensation and financial arrangements not only for executives but also for rank-and-file employees. Originality/value By extending the audit pricing literature beyond executive incentives, this paper highlights how broader compensation structures shape audit risk perceptions and engagement outcomes. It further uncovers a mechanism through which rank-and-file stock options influence audit fees, offering new insight into how employee compensation incentives affect audit outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Managerial Auditing Journal
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/maj-11-2024-4580
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the influence of rank-and-file employees’ equity incentives on audit pricing: evidence from stock options

Khaled Abdulsalam
3 citations
Managerial Auditing Journal
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
11.73
article

Investigating the influence of rank-and-file employees’ equity incentives on audit pricing: evidence from stock options

Khaled Abdulsalam
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate whether equity incentives granted to rank-and-file employees influence audit pricing in US firms. While prior research has primarily focused on executive compensation, this study explores how broad-based stock options compensation impacts auditors’ risk assessments and engagement outcomes, particularly through the lens of agency theory and behavioral risk theory. Design/methodology/approach Using a sample of 19,588 firm-year observations from 2004 to 2020, the study uses multivariate regression models, path analysis, entropy balancing and two-stage least squares to examine the relationship between rank-and-file employees’ stock options and audit outcomes. Findings This study documents a significant positive association between rank-and-file employees’ stock options and audit fees, suggesting that auditors view these incentives as indicators of elevated audit risk. This association is more pronounced among smaller firms, where governance and oversight mechanisms tend to be weaker. A path analysis shows that the relationship is mediated by a higher likelihood of material internal control weaknesses. Additionally, this study finds that rank-and-file equity incentives are associated with longer audit report lags, consistent with increased audit effort by auditors. Practical implications The findings of this study suggest that audit standards should be broadened to include the evaluation of compensation and financial arrangements not only for executives but also for rank-and-file employees. Originality/value By extending the audit pricing literature beyond executive incentives, this paper highlights how broader compensation structures shape audit risk perceptions and engagement outcomes. It further uncovers a mechanism through which rank-and-file stock options influence audit fees, offering new insight into how employee compensation incentives affect audit outcomes.

Managerial Auditing JournalVol. 40(7)
Shaqra University (SA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
11.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.